Eu scared stiff by Boris !

Which of the candidates would you vote for?

Also who would be your ideal leader of the Torys?
The worst type of Tory is the working class Tory such as Esther McVile , these types are driven by ambition and would persecute their own grannies if got them to the top.
The old style aristocratic type of Tory had nothing to prove and could be quite civilised and honourable on occasion.
 
Sponsored Links
The worst type of Tory is the working class Tory such as Esther McVile , these types are driven by ambition and would persecute their own grannies if got them to the top.
The old style aristocratic type of Tory had nothing to prove and could be quite civilised and honourable on occasion.
The best type of tory is still worse than any other politician...

Except of course Garbage or his racist/xenophobic party...

Or his previous racist/xenophobic party...

Or liebour...

Or the literal dingbats...

Or basically any politician/political party you care to mention...

(although on second thoughts, given our history the tories are still definitely the worst :))
 
The best type of tory is still worse than any other politician...

Except of course Garbage or his racist/xenophobic party...

Or his previous racist/xenophobic party...

Or liebour...

Or the literal dingbats...

Or basically any politician/political party you care to mention...

(although on second thoughts, given our history the tories are still definitely the worst :))


Your a very bitter man.
 
Sponsored Links
The best type of tory is still worse than any other politician...

Except of course Garbage or his racist/xenophobic party...

Or his previous racist/xenophobic party...

Or liebour...

Or the literal dingbats...

Or basically any politician/political party you care to mention...

(although on second thoughts, given our history the tories are still definitely the worst :))

There are some good politicians.

Its sad really that tge ones we see are the worst of the bunch.
 
Lol, here's me thinking gasbag was talking about looks when he said they all look the same.
Mine are unique boyo and there is nowt in your above statement to contradict it.:)

As for modern techniques - I'd take those over wattle and daub any day. Oh, and no apologies for adhering to Building Regulations either. WTF they have anything to with all buildings looking the same is anyone's guess. gasbag for ya.(y)

Well obviously you're a wet trade and not a designer or architect and the point sailed over your head, to be expected with your limited view.
I'm not saying building regs are wrong, I'm merely pointing out that with complying to building regs it limits imaginative concepts. And I'm not proposing the use of wattle and daub. The point I was making is that vernacular architecture which led to varying pleasing regional aspects of design is now missing. But there there you didn't get the point it doesn't matter to you ...thats probably for the best as you just don't get it. Much like you are with everything else ....go mix some finish or mortar we don't wish to confuse you.
 
Well obviously you're trade and not a designer or architect
Well spotted. I engage with architects often and give feed-back. What do pipe bender's know about architecture? As for brains, the hardest thing mentally a gas fitter has to do is get the customer to read the fitting instructions to them on the latest Worcester Bosch.
:mrgreen:
 
Last edited:
As for brains, the hardest thing mentally a gas fitter has to do is get the customer to read the fitting instructions to them on the latest Worcester Bosch.
:mrgreen:


I'm going to sue you. Your a filthy man.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I engage with architects


Your like the Indian woman who stands up in question time and shouts. '"My father's built this country.'"

I'm shouting at the TV
"'Don't admit that, this country's falling apart'"

I like the Indians, you see.

But we can blame you now for advising the Architects
 
If you choose not to fulfill your monetary commitments because you fell out with your partner(s), that would constitute a default...

And if you default, future lenders would not give you such a good deal as you had before...

Because given your previous actions you would be deemed as a bigger risk of further defaults...

It really is very simple!

It doesn't look like you understood the question. Let me try again with some bold

I've not seen any credible legal argument that its a debt. Has anyone?
 
It doesn't look like you understood the question. Let me try again with some bold
Let me explain further for the dim witted ;)

The UK as a sovereign state signed an EU budget which runs until 2020...

That budget includes provision for many future financial outlays already planned including things such as pensions...

Were we to renege on that agreement (before the end of the budget cycle), then we would be legally obliged to pay the bill or find ourselves in the international arbitration court in the Hague...

But hey it's not all bad news...

Should the UK win in the Hague, Garbage might not get his EU pension (y)

And the delay in leaving will actually reduce the 'divorce bill'...

Maybe one day dumb quitters will understand that if we 'delay' leaving indefinitely we'll be quids in (y)

Edit: Anyway, all this talk of the amount that will or will not be paid is b ollox anyway...

If the BofE can hit the print button to bail out the banks to the tune of hundreds of billions of pounds, then £39bn is pocket money...

Of course what quitters don't understand is that we will all have to eventually pay when a currency is devalued by printing money!
 
So according to you its an international commercial dispute? Or are you confusing the role of the ICA with PCA ?
 
Boris camp was doing fine, but now they have only gone and let him speak, big mistake.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top