B
Bodd
I think they are....... I don't take sugar...... I think I know where your going with this John but you tell me what your point is?
I think they are....... I don't take sugar...... I think I know where your going with this John but you tell me what your point is?
B
Bodd
John your on one side of the argument and Im on the other side of the argument...... On your side will be Nosey, BLM, Lewis Hamilton; Hypocrites
I've been to Kanchanaburi yet I drive a Japanese car as I have no problem with the Japs.
I'm in the side that deplores slavery and forced labour. Which side are you on?
B
Bodd
Im with you there John ,......
I but I cant blame the Japanese or the Germans of today. Nor do I blame the UK for what happened two hundred or so years ago. Now if you do still hold the UK responsible for the slave trade then I suggest you don't drive a German or Japanese car. Or take sugar in your tea.
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't. However I do comment on people who try to point at the record of one country while ignoring the record of their own.
Hmmmmm.
And I applaud modern nations that try to atone for past national misdeeds. They are quite rare.
I haven't seen them on the grid last season, if that's what you're getting at.
B
Bodd
I do not hold the German people of today responsible for the Nazi war machine..... Yet I will question Lewis Hamilton support for what BLM stand for while driving for a company that used Slave labour..... is it only slave labour of a certain colour that counts.....
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
Most people, when they use others' work, refer to them with accreditation.
If you don't and you pretend that the work is your own, it's called plagiarism.
So if you're going to copy and paste, you ought to show the reader from where you copied it so that they can verify it, if they so wish, that it was written in the context that you've used it.
I'm sure you've seen how many a quote on here that has been snipped, and even pasted back together to change the meaning to that desired by the person copying and pasting.
By including a reference back to the original, you allow the reader to verify that you haven't done likewise.
However, if you read something, and repeat it by paraphrasing it, (i.e. carry over the message but not word for word, nor copied and reprinted) that's allowed and you don't need to provide references.

Do what
Can u not condense that post than I can give u an intetlectual answer
him me
Lol. You are such a disingenuous ****.
