- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,980
- Reaction score
- 3,068
- Country

Which question do you want answered, I'll trade you.
Me too.


Which question do you want answered, I'll trade you.
The inventor of creating mRNA in the lab that allowed someone else to invent mRNA vaccines? He's been spouting a lot of crap during Covid. It turns out that heartburn medication was no more useful than HydroxycholoroquineWould this guy - Dr. Robert W Malone - qualify as a nutjob anti-vaxxer, whose opinion should not be listened to????
The inventor of creating mRNA in the lab that allowed someone else to invent mRNA vaccines? He's been spouting a lot of crap during Covid. It turns out that heartburn medication was no more useful than Hydroxycholoroquine
He was wrong when he claimed that the vaccines were killing two people for every three they saved.So he's a nutjob then?
So perhaps he is. There's a depressing line of top notch scientific minds losing the plot as they get older. Which is why science doesn't rely on people, it relies on data.
Yes, every medical body in the world have all gone mad at the exact same time for no apparent reason.It seems to me that there's an awful lot of 'top notch' scientists losing their minds recently, is there something in the water?
I doubt you can be clear about anything.If I may, can I just clarify whether science relies on people or data?
I doubt you can be clear about anything.
According to here it's around 8% now.PCR Positivity levels is not far short of what it was in the last peak ~16% compared with ~15%
Be as clear as you likeIf I may, can I just clarify whether science relies on people or data?
Be as clear as you like
You have my full, unequivocal permission. Make your point if you choose to, or don't either works for me.If I may, can I just clarify whether science relies on people or data?
According to here it's around 8% now.
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/testing?areaType=nation&areaName=England
Which is pretty bad but not near the peak for either wave 1 or 2. It is high enough to show that it is likely to be a significant under estimate. The ONS weekly survey will be more accurate in that case.