Immigrants welcome in Poland, illegal immigrants no chance ......

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Safety of our citizens is paramount

Says it all. If only our treacherous politicians cared so much for our safety.

Poland, together with Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia are known as the Visegrad Group or Visegrad 4. They are the last bastion of sanity in Europe when it comes to retaining their cultures and identities. They have resisted the destructive and dangerous influx of aliens that most other European countries have suffered. As a result their countries remain safe from those from alien cultures and religions, some of which hate our western culture and set out to cause harm to indigenous populations who have been kowed into accepting mass immigration as inevitable and even good for them. On all counts, the opposite is true. When I visit The Czech Republic, it is good to see that the population is virtually 100% caucasian away from the capital. Just like I remember large parts of The UK in my youth. The main group of foreigners in Prague is Vitenamese, who seem quite peaceful and mainly run small convenience stores. CZ remains the safest country I have ever visited, and it is safe to wander anywhere day or night, even in the capital Prague.

As in Mission Impossible, this message may disappear in 60 seconds. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
They are the last bastion of sanity in Europe when it comes to retaining their cultures and identities. They have resisted the destructive and dangerous influx of aliens that most other European countries have suffered.
If a culture and identity is so fragile, does it deserve to be protected?
Strong cultures and identities add to an overall mix of cultures but dominate the others.
 
The illegals that mosey on ashore after their dinghy ride, dont ask permission to enter the UK either.
 
Sponsored Links
Says it all. If only our treacherous politicians cared so much for our safety.

Poland, together with Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia are known as the Visegrad Group or Visegrad 4. They are the last bastion of sanity in Europe when it comes to retaining their cultures and identities. They have resisted the destructive and dangerous influx of aliens that most other European countries have suffered. As a result their countries remain safe from those from alien cultures and religions, some of which hate our western culture and set out to cause harm to indigenous populations who have been kowed into accepting mass immigration as inevitable and even good for them. On all counts, the opposite is true. When I visit The Czech Republic, it is good to see that the population is virtually 100% caucasian away from the capital. Just like I remember large parts of The UK in my youth. The main group of foreigners in Prague is Vitenamese, who seem quite peaceful and mainly run small convenience stores. CZ remains the safest country I have ever visited, and it is safe to wander anywhere day or night, even in the capital Prague.

As in Mission Impossible, this message may disappear in 60 seconds. :rolleyes:
I don't disagree with portions of your post, however the BIB troubles me slightly, granted I have a vested interest. Are you saying, thinking of the UK, your preference would be a near 100% Caucasian population outside of the UK capitals and perhaps large cities? I'm not sure where that would leave me as a non Caucasian that doesn't live in a capital or city. Although I was born here (mixed race) would your preference be that I leave?

Btw not being contentious, not trying to start an argument, genuinely interested in your reply/thoughts. I find it interesting that these conversations often seem to boil down to skin colour.
 
Went to Baku in Azerbaijan a few years ago, talked to some ex-pats who lived and worked there in the oil industry and they had no intention of going back to Britain, they said Baku was the safest place imaginable. We found Kiev and Belgrade to be very safe places too.
 
I don't disagree with portions of your post, however the BIB troubles me slightly, granted I have a vested interest. Are you saying, thinking of the UK, your preference would be a near 100% Caucasian population outside of the UK capitals and perhaps large cities? I'm not sure where that would leave me as a non Caucasian that doesn't live in a capital or city. Although I was born here (mixed race) would your preference be that I leave?

Btw not being contentious, not trying to start an argument, genuinely interested in your reply/thoughts. I find it interesting that these conversations often seem to boil down to skin colour.

What I was saying was some countries still have the majority of their population as the indigenous population - in CZ's case, it happens to be caucasian. They don't suffer through lack of diversity, there are no downsides to lack of diversity (unlike the brainwashing we receive about it being all good and a big benefit) and they have a very settled, largely contented and cohesive population. They all share the same values and traditions, with the benefit that there is no one to be offended or the need for others to be offended on behalf of others.

Unfortunately, despite what our 'leaders' say, mixing cultures and races often causes problems and tensions. In The UK and other countries with high immigrant populations, the incomers form ghettos where violence and crime often proliferates. London is a good exmple, with gangs fighting it out with guns and knives, usually over drugs. These violent gangs are not made up of the indigenous population. Other capitals and provincial cities in former Soviet Bloc countries don't have ghettos, hence there aren't unsafe areas. It has to be said that certain imported cultures are quite industrious and an asset to their host nation. Unfortunately, others are often problematic. This is taken as a whole, though I accept their will be many exceptions either way.
 
Last edited:
If a culture and identity is so fragile, does it deserve to be protected?

Do you think that red squirrels shouldn't exist because greys are more aggressive?

Should the greys keep their own territory, and invade the red's territory?

Is strength the only measure of the validity of a group's existence?
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know how many muslims there are in Poland?

Also, how many Polish MPs have been assassinated recently? What is the extent of drug dealing there? How many little girls have been groomed and raped? How many lorries have mowed groups of people down in busy streets there? How many bombings have there been? How many teachers and priests have been decapitated lately?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In the 50’s and 60’s Immigrants from the subcontinent were invited to the UK because the indigenous population didn’t want to work in the dirty and noisy mills and factories. One could argue the country was built by these hardworking immigrants.
 
In the 50’s and 60’s Immigrants from the subcontinent were invited to the UK because the indigenous population didn’t want to work in the dirty and noisy mills and factories. One could argue the country was built by these hardworking immigrants.

I do believe the majority were Muslim.
 
In the 50’s and 60’s Immigrants from the subcontinent were invited to the UK because the indigenous population didn’t want to work in the dirty and noisy mills and factories. One could argue the country was built by these hardworking immigrants.

It wasn't because people didn't want to do them, my understanding is that there wasn't the workforce after the war to carry out the work and so people were given incentives to come here.

Speaking of which the windrush scandal is a terrible thing and I genuinely can't believe our politicians treated these people so appallingly, and still continue to do so.
 
In the 50’s and 60’s Immigrants from the subcontinent were invited to the UK because the indigenous population didn’t want to work in the dirty and noisy mills and factories. One could argue the country was built by these hardworking immigrants.

What a monstrous and specious generalisation! You make it sound as if the mills and factories of the 50s and 60s were entirely staffed by muslim immigrants! Do you work for the BBC at all?

The original muslim immigrants into the northern towns were mostly hardworking and decent. It's their descendants and the more recent immigrants that are causing all the trouble now.
 
What I was saying was some countries still have the majority of their population as the indigenous population - in CZ's case, it happens to be caucasian. They don't suffer through lack of diversity, there are no downsides to lack of diversity (unlike the brainwashing we receive about it being all good and a big benefit) and they have a very settled, largely contented and cohesive population. They all share the same values and traditions, with the benefit that there is no one to be offended or the need for others to be offended on behalf of others.

Unfortunately, despite what our 'leaders' say, mixing cultures and races often causes problems and tensions. In The UK and other countries with high immigrant populations, the incomers form ghettos where violence and crime often proliferates. London is a good exmple, with gangs fighting it out with guns and knives, usually over drugs. These violent gangs are not made up of the indigenous population. Other capitals and provincial cities in former Soviet Bloc countries don't have ghettos, hence there aren't unsafe areas. It has to be said that certain imported cultures are quite industrious and an asset to their host nation. Unfortunately, others are often problematic. This is taken as a whole, though I accept their will be many exceptions either way.

Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary didn’t go around the world invading countries, taking wealth and slaves.


British Empire……
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top