Sort of, we're behind some countries now in the lower age groups. It does factor into why we've allowed the case numbers to continue to soar.Ah, so "Good availability of tests" has been replaced.
Are you now saying that vaccinations are one of the reasons why new cases are so high?

put up where it is supposed to be soaring.
Are you nearly admitting they (new cases) are irrelevant?No, they're one of the reasons they've been allowed to be so high.
Probably saying it for effect - like the currency sites when the pound rises half a cent - to emphasise his belief that more restrictions and vaccinating children should be done.So if it isn't soaring do you think the Professor is just wrong, or perhaps lying?
No, that would be stupid.Are you nearly admitting they (new cases) are irrelevant?

Probably saying it for effect
According the the full post, ( the bit you ignored ) she had Covid.
Yes, compared to the bit to the left on the graph you haven't shown.
Bingo! I think I win again.
![]()
If, back at the beginning of last year, our governments hadn't scared everybody out of their wits by declaring this illness a world emergency, people would have called it a cold, got over it and carried on.
Only utter idiots who can't count. There was concern the false positive rate could have been as high as 0.1%. It wasn't, for a PCR it is less/fewer than 1 in 20,000 tests run.Also, we don't know how many results were false positives. Some would have it that most positive covid tests are falsely positive.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/tran...edcovid19deathspcrtestingandfalsepositiverateWe know the specificity of our RT-PCR test must be very close to 100%, in particular, the data suggest that the false-positive rate is very low -- under 0.005%. For more information on the accuracy of PCR and Lateral Flow testing, please see this study and our recently published blog

Some would have it that most positive covid tests are falsely positive.