- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,094
- Reaction score
- 5,498
- Country
Somebody, somewhere will test it. But its not redundant its capability based (I think thats what you meant anyway). They are no longer able to perform the duties of the job.
IKEA
- Thread starter transam
- Start date
..It reads not as redundancy in the usual meaning, rather they will be putting themselves out of their jobs, so no dole money either. Serves 'em right. Bet the 10% falls to 1% quite rapidely.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 18243
And then... will those who cannot be redeployed or find another job be entitled to state benefits?
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,094
- Reaction score
- 5,498
- Country
Their employment would be terminated, they have not resigned.
A neighbour works at a GP's surgery. While she had no objections she was told she must have them and due to were she worked age didn't matter.
In terms of the hospital end of things the media do not seemed to have turned up anyone who says they wont have jabs. Just one that says they are reluctant and with a reason - they have had it and another rather small group taking selfies and wearing a blue ribbon. Some in the crowd would probably be sympathisers and passers by.
Typical covid - what ever will happen will.
In terms of the hospital end of things the media do not seemed to have turned up anyone who says they wont have jabs. Just one that says they are reluctant and with a reason - they have had it and another rather small group taking selfies and wearing a blue ribbon. Some in the crowd would probably be sympathisers and passers by.
Typical covid - what ever will happen will.
They were given a simple, easy option to continue in there employment - an essential jab, if they refuse, they have resigned.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,094
- Reaction score
- 5,498
- Country
Not legally though. My early view that it would be redundancy was before I read the legislation. People do things every day that result in them getting sacked. drugs, drink driving, smoking inside etc. theft etc.. laziness, external personal pressures etc. they don't lose benefits as a result.
They have until 3rd of February I think?
They have until 3rd of February I think?
D
Deleted member 292770
Stop your idiotic foolish nonsense ffs.
Sick Gloating old bigot.
They will face dismissal . Which means the nhs will have to SACK thousands of people.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,954
- Reaction score
- 3,098
- Country
They can be redeployed in to non patient facing roles. Or take a harmless jab of course.
I would be very surprised if that were true.
That does seem to be ~ correct but if some show willing maybe a bit of relaxation if they take one agreeing to the other. There is also the have had covid aspect. Not sure why but jabs will only be given 4 weeks later. Some one on the box mentioned that so assume it is the rule. I do know they ask before giving a jab which ever one it is.Saving vaccine doesn't sound to be a sensible reason. Many are by appointment.
LOL Giving people long time to get used to something or the other isn't that unusual.
What morons would bring that upon themselves?
It takes a few minutes, costs nowt, relatively painless and harmless.
No brainer.
D
Deleted member 292770
we’re about to find out. And I suspect we’re not far away from finding out who the real morons are.
https://fb.watch/aCiCACVO11/
So you keep repeating.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,954
- Reaction score
- 3,098
- Country
