human rights lawyers have blocked 1st plane of asylum seekers to Rwanda

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Perhaps they might meet up when they are both waving off the first load of refugees at the airport on Tuesday?
Not a bad idea, at least he'd get to discuss important issues - like record breaking migrant channel crossings etc. Seems they have resumed. So much for the Rwanda threat eh.
 
Not a bad idea, at least he'd get to discuss important issues - like record breaking migrant channel crossings etc. Seems they have resumed. So much for the Rwanda threat eh.
Let’s see how long it takes for word to get back eh and then see how keen they are to pay good money to risk their life in a dinghy crossing the channel to get here.
 
Let’s see how long it takes for word to get back eh and then see how keen they are to pay good money to risk their life in a dinghy crossing the channel to get here.
Word will have circulated and duly ignored. The Rwanda plan will fail. It's sole purpose was to get gammons like you and Filly excited and it worked. Just more populist garbage.
 
Let us not forget the infinite benefits of immigration...


 
Seems the judge ruled send them. This section of the charter that may relate

ARTICLE 31„ - i f -u • ,1 n . /• « /. Refugies en situation irreguhereRefugees unlawfully in the Country of Refuge т т „ -,a J dans le pays d accueil1. The Contracting States shall not imposepenalties, on account of their illegal entry orpresence, on refugees who, coming directlyfrom a territory where their life or freedomwas threatened in the sense of article 1, enteror are present in their territory withoutauthorization, provided they present them-selves without delay to the authorities andshow good cause for their illegal entry orpresence.2. The Contracting States shall not apply tothe movements of such refugees restrictionsother than those which are necessary and suchrestrictions shall only be applied until theirstatus in the country is regularized or theyobtain admission into another country. TheContracting States shall allow such refugees areasonable period and all the necessary facilitiesto obtain admission into another country

We signed up to it but there are reasons for rejecting people - not a refugee as defined and crime etc and certain countries

UK's exclusions here
 
A UNHCR rep on radio said that they had written to the Government to demand a retraction of the Government’s claim that they supported the policy.
it might be interesting if the judge was given misleading info.
However, if the Judge says it’s lawful, then it probably is.
A lawyer arguing the case is doing his job
 
French won’t be happy if it starts to deter migrants leaving France

Perhaps the French will fund some type of legal
Action in the courts via a 3rd party

Than of course there are back handers (???) that may be involved from the people smugglers to french plod to turn a blind eye ????

Scoundrels
 
However, if the Judge says it’s lawful, then it probably is.
A judicial review has been mentioned now ................................................

:) Transam is looking up his backside again.
 
Word will have circulated and duly ignored. The Rwanda plan will fail. It's sole purpose was to get gammons like you and Filly excited and it worked. Just more populist garbage.


The news that it's going ahead isnt 30 minutes old.. give it a chance
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top