Given that the state is the primary beneficiary of new population, it makes sense the state should pay for that benefit.Always supposing, and the important point - that the parents can provide for their kids, without relying on the state's support.
Given that the state is the primary beneficiary of new population, it makes sense the state should pay for that benefit.Always supposing, and the important point - that the parents can provide for their kids, without relying on the state's support.
Given that the state is the primary beneficiary of new population, it makes sense the state should pay for that benefit.
What you own can be confiscated by the state at any moment. Ask the russians how they know? What was his name again, that football club owner? You merely live in a bubble of fiction. But, don't let me burst it. I am not that cruel.The state has no money, apart from the money contributed by it's population and what they earn.
The aspect that they will never be entirely clear about. Actually there seems to be some background arguments about this area at the moment. Some feeling we need them to allow growth and to fix up certain areas.It won't change the fact the UK population number is stagnating and the need to import refugees and immigrants.
What you own can be confiscated by the state at any moment. Ask the russians how they know? What was his name again, that football club owner? You merely live in a bubble of fiction. But, don't let me burst it. I am not that cruel.
"Russian" is merely a place holder. When things are desperate that place holder can hold something else.You do have a strange point of view, but don't let me burst your personal bubble. This is not Russia and I am not Russian, nor do I own a football club.
It's called socialism. Use the imports to give the indigenous a better life. The imports work, the indigenous claim benefit. Similarly, the imports do the most unattractive jobs while the indigenous do the better ones.The aspect that they will never be entirely clear about. Actually there seems to be some background arguments about this area at the moment. Some feeling we need them to allow growth and to fix up certain areas.
Figure out why for yourself. It's not difficult.
That football club is in the UK.
Far from it really. An obscure example. Go back to lockdowns and people encouraged to go fruit etc picking. Some did. Couple of days later they felt like cripples and gave up.It's called socialism
That got them how far exactly? They are 10 generations behind the kebab and takeaway shop owners who never got very far themselves.An odd aspect about boat people - they have demonstrated a fair amount of gumption.
That got them how far exactly? They are 10 generations behind the kebab and takeaway shop owners who never got very far themselves.
Please don't allocate anything as hideous as that to me. It is absolutely like nothing I would say.Are you turning into Pat Ex?!?
Then why are there so many kids un-adopted?There are plenty of people wanting to adopt.
Government statistics show that, in England as of 31 March 2020, there were 80,080 children in care. In that same period only 3,440 children were adopted.
That'll mean more women on the streets. Mothers will do anything to keep and support their children.In other words, if you're on long term benefit and get pregnant, you're going to have it taken off you unless you organise more income.