I was asking you a question...Do I?
(the clue is the '?' at the end )
So do you agree with the idea that she should always follow the recommendations of an independent inquiry?
Yes or no will suffice
I was asking you a question...Do I?
So do you agree with the idea that she should always follow the recommendations of an independent inquiry?
No.So do you agree with the idea that she should never follow the recommendations of an independent inquiry?
No.So how about you answer yes or no to my original question?
Off topic. You should play your stupid word games elsewhere...Independent inquiries have stated that her asylum seeker proposals are illegal in international law...
Lol...Off topic. You should play your stupid word games elsewhere...
See my earlier comment re prisons and courts re your combatting crime view.That the police (and our law system in general) are of little use in combatting crime.
Criminals should exist in fear of the police. With ineffective policing everybody lives in fear of criminals,
No.
So how about you answer yes or no to my original question?
We'll try again shall we...
So do you agree with the idea that she should always follow the recommendations of an independent inquiry?
Yes or no will suffice
Quite. Just @ellal playing silly games.Transam would weigh up the evidence and than come to a carefully considered conclusion
It would be nice if the criminals feared the police but the days when they could have a good talk to someone in a cell are unfortunately long gone.
Oh the ironyQuite. Just @ellal playing silly games.
You don't think that people responsible for children's care should be required to report abuse? Wow...And is also going against independent advice to not criminalise anyone working with children who doesn't act as the government demands...
No, it's an abuser hunt...It's going to be a witch hunt!