BBC news Black out

[motorbiking]

I understand perfectly that you are unable to quote a sentence or paragraph that supports your false claim.

Because there isn't one.

Do you think its lawful to stir hatred towards a group of people that you have Labelled Zionists? yes/no

 

[motorbiking]

How do you expect accurate reporting on any issue if a government bans the BeeB? Israel is trying to control the narrative - people like you distort the narrative - and organisations like the BeeB take flak for not being as impartial as Jews would like. They've been long accustomed to having their cake that they can't take legitimate criticism of their government.

Just showing your own bias there.

 

[JohnD]

Do you think its lawful to stir hatred towards a group of people that you have Labelled Zionists? yes/no

I think it is dishonest of you to falsely claim that English law says something that it doesn't.

If, tomorrow, you claim "the Road Traffic Act defines a penguin as a fish" I might criticise your lie.

You are unable to quote a sentence or paragraph that supports your false claim.

Because there isn't one.

 

[motorbiking]

I think it is dishonest of you to falsely claim that English law says something that it doesn't.

If, tomorrow, you claim "the Road Traffic Act defines a penguin as a fish" I might criticise your lie.

You are unable to quote a sentence or paragraph that supports your false claim.

Because there isn't one.

It was a simple question? If you answer it, it will help me educate you about the law.

The alternative is I leave you in ignorance.

I don't care which you choose

 

[Odds]

Just showing your own bias there.

Nuts.

 

[JohnD]

You are unable to quote a sentence or paragraph that supports your false claim.

Because there isn't one.

 

[motorbiking]

You are unable to quote a sentence or paragraph that supports your false claim.

Because there isn't one.

I have done multiple times - You pretend I haven't, so I am to conclude you are going with ignorance - thats your choice.

 

[denso13]

I have done multiple times

You have posted what you think the law means and others disagree. You aren't judge and jury, nowhere near it.

 

[motorbiking]

You have posted what you think the law means and others disagree. You aren't judge and jury, nowhere near it.

Disagreeing is great, but it's helpful to set out your arguments. JohnD wont even say if he thinks it's illegal to stir hatred against a group of people he labels Zionist. Surely its not a hard question?

what do you think - yes or no?

 

[JohnD]

My opinion has no effect on English Law, and is irrelevant to the falsity of your claim.

 

[denso13]

what do you think - yes or no?

It's a "when did you stop beating your wife" question. Criticism is allowed.

 

[JohnD]

I have done multiple times

No, you have not, because there is no sentence or paragraph that says what you falsely claim.

If there was, you would quote it.

You can't, because there isn't one.

 

[Andydevon]

Dumb and Dumber (1994) ⭐ 7.3 | Comedy

1h 47m | 12

www.imdb.com

 

[motorbiking]

It's a "when did you stop beating your wife" question. Criticism is allowed.

you are welcome to phrase it differently.

Do you think its lawful to display any written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting toward a group of people that you label as Zionists?

its quite simple.

You define what racial hatred is. Meaning of “racial hatred”. Sec 17 Public order act
Your define an offence of "Acts intended or likely to stir up racial hatred". Sec 18 Public order act

which bit do you think I am wrong about?

The meaning of race or religion? the meaning of acts intended to stir racial or religious hatred or the definition of having regard for all the circumstances.

Or is it the definition Zionist?

 

[IT Minion]

What skin in the games does Cohen and Deech have?

I don't know, who funded the report?