It's all part of their 'freedom of speech', they hold so dear.That's the kind of thing that causes actual harm to people.

It's all part of their 'freedom of speech', they hold so dear.That's the kind of thing that causes actual harm to people.
It might have taking the edge off the Farage riots but there a few key words in their that might just have made them worse. Shamefully, one poster on here followed the trend by posting fake information about the murderer.
Yes, after spreading Fillyfacts™ in the first place. That's the kind of thing that causes actual harm to people.
Anyone come across this news outlet before - american I believe, but can it be believed?
![]()
The originator of the Farage Riots, Nigel Farage MP, really doesn't like them being referred to as the Farage Riots.
So lets call the butchering of those little girls the Blair, Brown, Cameron, Johnson, Truss, Sunak and Starmer murders if we're aportioning blame. They are the ones whose treachery created the situation that allowed these vile people to do their thing.

Just to be clear, I was responding to the question in the OP. Would more information being given at the time have helped quell the Farage riots? Maybe, maybe not.Just to be clear. Nigel Farage is not in government.
I was lead to believe by the press a Welsh choirboy was responsible.
How would revealing the "additional information" have helped except to encourage a more widespread attack on asylum seekers.

I don't recall Starmer being involved.Just to be clear. Nigel Farage is not in government. Rather than gunning for him, please direct your fire to the people in power who are responsible for the deaths of those poor girls and many others.

Wrong messages are very easyThat is what I can't decide. It is important that lessons are learnt for the future. But not the wrong ones.
I think his argument is that it was the information vacuum which caused speculation online, which in turn led to the riots. And if the above information had been released, then that would have prevented the riots.
Is there a difference between well informed irresponsibility and speculative irresponsibility. The riots and attacks were going to go ahead on the basis of lies anyway. You only need to look at the trumpf and pootin propoganda machines to see the way it works.That is what I can't decide. It is important that lessons are learnt for the future. But not the wrong ones.
I think his argument is that it was the information vacuum which caused speculation online, which in turn led to the riots. And if the above information had been released, then that would have prevented the riots.
off you go thenI don’t know why anyone bothers posting in the GD now.
Its so far left in here

This is what the Farage rioters would have taken from it,And if the above information had been released, then that would have prevented the riots.
This is what the Farage rioters would have taken from it,
"The public could have been told immediately that there had been an attack by a 17-year-old male who was black, British, born in Wales and has lived in the UK all his life," he told us.
"That he comes from a Rwandan background, and as far as the police were aware, from a Christian background. That it was not possible to say whether he had an ideology or that he was a terrorist. But the police are looking at, at pace, all the material that they found."