• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Responsibility of electrical intake equipment in flats

1744303137735.png
 
<a copy of my post which started this part of the discussion>
I'm not sure what you're attempting to prove by repeating my post here, and I'm tiring of having to repeatedly re-post what I've already written.

Right at that start, I merely pointed out that at least some (probably most/all) suppliers have contractual agreements with customers (even if 'deemed' ones) in which the supplier agrees to supply electricity so long as the customer complies with their obligations under the contract - one of which (in the example I quoted) was to permit the supplier to "install any metering equipment".

Hence (for the umpteenth time), although I haven't yet heard of it happening, a supplier probably could use the contractual agreements to effectively 'force' any type of meter (including a 'smart' one) onto a customer who wanted to continue receiving an electricity supply from them.

I'm not going to repeat myself yet again, so .... "I'm out"
 
I thought it was obvious there'd have to be a meter, smart or otherwise (in a domestic or commercial property).
Yes - but, given that, as you say, it is obvious that there must be some sort of meter, that underlines the fact that it is also obvious that acceptance of a meter is part of the contractual agreement - which, as in the example I quoted, usually includes the customer's agreement that the supply may install "any metering equipment" (i.e. 'of their choice') - which would include 'smart' meters.
 
Yes - but, given that, as you say, it is obvious that there must be some sort of meter, that underlines the fact that it is also obvious that acceptance of a meter is part of the contractual agreement - which, as in the example I quoted, usually includes the customer's agreement that the supply may install "any metering equipment" (i.e. 'of their choice') - which would include 'smart' meters.
Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't see what that has to do with my #48 and #50. As in the other thread on this subject, Octopus haven't said I must have a smart meter because of the contract, not yet anyway.

Edited
 
Last edited:
Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't see what that has to do with my #48 and #50. As in the other thread on this subject, Octopus haven't said I must have a meter because of the contract, not yet anyway.
Are you saying you don't have a meter?


FWIW I had a single phase unmetered supply for a number of years, it consisted of 3/0.036 double insulated tails from a 3ph head to a metal FCU with 3A fuse with the equipment flex connected directly. There were several similar services and several metered supplies, about 8 tails altogether from the 3ph head. When I took the service over in 1994 I was paying £28 +VAT. It would have been around 2008 I was paying close to £60 inc VAT. We did a change of customer name and address (as he passed away) and automatically a meter was fitted, the first year it showed I used less energy than predicted but the commercial meter rental (supplier would not accept amateur radio was non commercial) took the cost to around £150.
 
Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't see what that has to do with my #48 and #50. As in the other thread on this subject, Octopus haven't said I must have a meter because of the contract, not yet anyway.
As I've written (more than once) to the best of my knowledge, NO supplier has yet attempted to force a 'smart' meter onto anyone, presumably not the least because they are still finding enough customers who accept such a meter without any argument to enable them to achieve the government-imposed targets.

All of this discussion has arisen because I pointed out that although 'smart' meters are not 'compulsory' in law, contracts are such that, should they so wish, suppliers could probably refuse to provide (or continue providing) an electricity supply if a customer is not prepared to honour the contractual agreement to allow the supplier to install "any metering equipment".

As above, to the best of my knowledge that has NOT happened yet, but it could well do when suppliers start having difficulty finding enough 'willing' recipients of 'smart meters' to enable them to meet the ('compulsory') targets imposed on them (hence avoiding financial penalties).
 
All of this discussion has arisen because I pointed out that although 'smart' meters are not 'compulsory' in law,
Hallelujah!

No, it started because you said Eric and I were wrong in stating that smart meters are not compulsory.

1744461809590.png

...yet now you say that might not have happened yet.
 
Are you saying you don't have a meter?
Sorry, I meant smart meter! Now edited
WIW I had a single phase unmetered supply for a number of years, it consisted of 3/0.036 double insulated tails from a 3ph head to a metal FCU with 3A fuse with the equipment flex connected directly.
OK, never heard of that arrangement, but we live and learn
 
Last edited:
No, it started because you said Eric and I were wrong in stating that smart meters are not compulsory.
Whereupon I pointed out that suppliers could probably make it effectively 'compulsory' (for anyone who wanted a continuing electricity supply from them), because of contractual obligations- and, although that has not yet happened, they may well eventually have to start doing that (to avoid financial penalties for not achieving targets) when they start running out of people 'willing' to accept such meters.

I don't think that anyone (certainly not me) has ever suggested that 'smart' meters are 'compulsory' in law.

"The law" is not the only thing that can make things effectively 'compulsory'.
 
I thought the question was who can correct the problem with a box, 1744468188183.png not if he could be forced to have a smart meter.

It does seem someone is being awkward, likely to get out of doing some work. I also had a problem getting a smart meter, they said there was not enough room on the board to fit it. Looking at the board 1744468561352.png since the radio teleswitch will go, they seem to have loads of room. Maybe I am being silly, but it seems Octopus has taken control by putting on the labels 1744468821371.png they can't put on a label saying no one else must touch it, and at the same time say it is not their responsibility. Either the label is in error, and they need to remove it, or it's their job, can't have it both ways.
 

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Back
Top