D
Deleted member 317777
Arse lickerYou know where the door is. DIYnot will continue regardless.
-
Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.
Locked out of a thread
- Thread starter Murdochcat
- Start date
Here's a journalist being locked out - repeatedly - of pointing out Deform, Fromage, and RWR hypocrisy and thin skin.
Get exorcised about that, rather than a privately run forum.
Get exorcised about that, rather than a privately run forum.
No.
I answered MBK’s question correctly. The fact that the dim witted moron does not understand his own grammar and has gone off on one, is his problem.
I’m sure he’ll apologise when he realises.
No.
I answered MBK’s question correctly. The fact that the dim witted moron does not understand his own grammar and has gone off on one, is his problem.
I’m sure he’ll apologise when he realises.
I think I was on the right lines. It might not technically be a double negative, but it is to do with grammatical construction.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,786
- Reaction score
- 5,339
- Country
Post 21 & 31 Boyo - straight out liesNo.
I answered MBK’s question correctly. The fact that the dim witted moron does not understand his own grammar and has gone off on one, is his problem.
I’m sure he’ll apologise when he realises.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,786
- Reaction score
- 5,339
- Country
Its at best an answer intended to deceive and in the context of the previous discussion a reinforcement of a lie.
Nonsense.
I’ve recently responded to Secure in the ‘66 thread. If I’d left the whole paragraph in, it would have been misleading or dishonest. My response was only relevant to the first few words.
Last edited:
I'm torn between my love of language and grammar and not wanting to get involved in somebody else's spat!
But I have to say, on this occasion, we all got it wrong. Me included.
Nonsense.
You are a renowned spineless liar (add chicken to that) and you don’t even understand your OWN grammar, so forgive the forum for disregarding your ignorance.
Nonsense. I answered your question honestly and correctly. If I’d answered ‘yes’, then you would have recourse.
Learn to read, dummy.
Edit: I’ve screenshotted the post, so don’t try your usual dishonest tricks.
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 4,507
- Reaction score
- 1,707
- Country
what you cut out was pertinent to what he said, ok it didn't alter meaning in this case but it hid a reference to what the other poster had felt was important - and what were you saving by deleting a dozen words ? by all means highlight the relevant words to what you are responding to - but don't cut stuff out (or at the very least inform others that you have snipped or hidden content)
Why not? It makes no sense, and the other poster is irelevant in this case.
Secures' post is still there for folk to read and is accessible (for context) via the convenient one touch link back.
Last edited:
Pathological liar? Really? Do you mean maintains an argument and doesn’t give up?
That applies to pretty much all the regular posters on both sides of the typical threads/discussions. It’s called multi tasking.
See post#9
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 4,507
- Reaction score
- 1,707
- Country
too often used to hide things and take stuff out of context - you know fine well others won't use that back button on every post they read. it's an unpleasant tactic you seem to like to use
pity the forum software does not highlight when quoted posts were snipped or altered
Similar threads
