
Jimmy was protected by his association with Maggie if anyoneTbf Kier was best mates with jimmy and helped keep him free
You’ve got to expect this sort of thing from a Labour PM.
No, It was Keir, it’s well known.Jimmy was protected by his association with Maggie if anyone
Kieth was in nappies when Jimmy was schmoozing the toreys. It was clear the establishment knew and turned a blind eye, the police, the Beeb etc etc.No, It was Keir, it’s well known.

Was that in a sex dungeon? He would have been late teens, early 20s when Maggie was in power, so if he was in nappies, it was either a fetish (reasonable assumption) or he couldn't control his bowels and bladder ( again, reasonable assumption as he is a panty wetter).Kieth was in nappies when Jimmy was schmoozing the toreys.

All the proof we need!!
I thought that was if you were going for a **** as it rhymes with duck?"I'm going for a Donald" if we needed a dump.
Nwgs2 knows that is a complete lieTbf Kier was best mates with jimmy and helped keep him free
No, it’s not.Nwgs2 knows that is a complete lie
Only took a few hours this time. Still made Starmer look a prat.Yeah I reckon it'll be another one of these scenarios where the person 'has the backing and full confidence of the PM' and x days maybe weeks later ... they're gone![]()
Notch defending a peadoNwgs2 knows that is a complete lie
He's accountable for the lawyers who didn't pursue the case, but this was after decades of turning a blind eye by the torey establishment.Kieth was in nappies when Jimmy was schmoozing the toreys. It was clear the establishment knew and turned a blind eye, the police, the Beeb etc etc.