Shows how untrustworthy the BBC are

[motorbiking]

He has a chance but only by browbeating them into submission. My post is evidence of the marmite approach to an incredibly powerful man. The error as accepted, is not enough, he must show harm to reputation or at least serious harm. A law that was tightened up to protect journalists will help the beeb. Plus they didn’t act maliciously, so fair comment

You think it was nothing more than sloppy editing?

 

[Odds]

"harm to reputation."

 

[blup]

You think it was nothing more than sloppy editing?

It wasn't malicious. For that theory to work there has to be a conspiracy because there's a production team hierarchy that checks and re checks these kind of programmes. The mistake, if there was one, was making an opinion (that Trumpf supported the rioters) seem like fact. That is not malicious but it is well out of time.

 

[Odds]

"harm to reputation."

 

[Koolpc]

BBC is changing its name to:

FBS......Foreign Broadcasting Corp..

 

[motorbiking]

It wasn't malicious. For that theory to work there has to be a conspiracy because there's a production team hierarchy that checks and re checks these kind of programmes. The mistake, if there was one, was making an opinion (that Trumpf supported the rioters) seem like fact. That is not malicious but it is well out of time.

I don't think you can say it was not malicious. Stitching two things together to create a false impression, to suit a narrative of negativity, is probably enough for there to be something to answer.

Probably worth you understanding the difference between the two:
Malicious Falsehood has four key elements:
(1) a false statement of fact published to a third party,
2) reference to the claimant or their identifiable business or economic interests,
(3) malice on the part of the publisher, and
(4) resulting pecuniary loss (special damage) unless dispensed with by statute.

In essence, the tort arises when a defendant maliciously publishes false words about the claimant (or the claimant’s business, products, or property) that cause quantifiable financial loss.

Again as I've already shown in the defamation act, the time limit can be waived, if his lawyers can convince the court.

 

[blup]

I don't think you can say it was not malicious. Stitching two things together to create a false impression, to suit a narrative of negativity, is probably enough for there to be something to answer.

Probably worth you understanding the difference between the two:
Malicious Falsehood has four key elements:
(1) a false statement of fact published to a third party,
2) reference to the claimant or their identifiable business or economic interests,
(3) malice on the part of the publisher, and
(4) resulting pecuniary loss (special damage) unless dispensed with by statute.

In essence, the tort arises when a defendant maliciously publishes false words about the claimant (or the claimant’s business, products, or property) that cause quantifiable financial loss.

Again as I've already shown in the defamation act, the time limit can be waived, if his lawyers can convince the court.

The programme went out two years after the event and it took another two years for the “error” to be spotted, hardly an excuse for the delay. Trumpf condemned the violence after the event, whilst apparently refusing to call the law enforcement agencies or appeal directly to the mob. That was the calculated political act of a president with a stolen election agenda . By the time the programme went out he had significantly rolled back from even that initial condemnation.There is no negativity around a false narrative that the election was stolen. No malice, no loss, no haste, no case.

 

[motorbiking]

The programme went out two years after the event and it took another two years for the “error” to be spotted, hardly an excuse for the delay. Trumpf condemned the violence after the event, whilst apparently refusing to call the law enforcement agencies or appeal directly to the mob. That was the calculated political act of a president with a stolen election agenda . By the time the programme went out he had significantly rolled back from even that initial condemnation.There is no negativity around a false narrative that the election was stolen. No malice, no loss, no haste, no case.

Your opinion is valid, but probably wrong in law. We well see what happens tomorrow

 

[noseall]

"harm to reputation."

A convicted felon and rapist, along with a strong chance he’s a nonce. My guess is the beeb gave his reputation a distractive leg-up.

Let tge fat orange rapist sue, then delay.

 

[blup]

Your opinion is valid, but probably wrong in law. We well see what happens tomorrow

Legal
I can see how on a narrow technicality the beeb might lose - they have already conceded the factual point. If they stand firm - which looks increasingly doubtful - they can win on delay and malice. All the right wingers who criticise over spending, will rejoice at the news that they are paying his damages.
Morally
Trumpf presided over the biggest threat to Americun democracy by his actions and lack of action. In its context the admitted error is squeaky hinge on a titanic deckchair
Bullies
You have to stand up to them, they usually collapse

 

[Lower]

Nobody, not a single person has come up with a single valid example of how asylum seekers have actually affected them personally

We had an attempted break in just after christmas on a sunday at 5am. We were in the house whilst 3 men tried to smash their way in through the back door with an 4 ft long metal bar. Thankfully, they ran off when i came downstairs in my PJ's clutching my son's hockey stick and turned on some lights. They were caught on our ring cameras and the police caught, arrested and charged them in the summer, along with 9 others.

They were a part of an Albanian gang who had been breaking into houses all around our area for approx 6 months. Of the people arrested, approx half were asylum seekers, and the remainder were either here illegally or had outstayed any legal right to remain.

Apart from scaring the living daylights out of my wife and son, it cost us an insurance claim of £2k for a new back door, of which i had to pay £400 directly and ongoing increased insurance premiums. My 14 year old son spent the week after the attempted break in sleeping on a mattress on our bedroom floor because he was so scared and my wife still wakes me up everytime the house creaks as it settles during the night.

That specific enough for you?

 

[fillyboy]

We had an attempted break in just after christmas on a sunday at 5am. We were in the house whilst 3 men tried to smash their way in through the back door with an 4 ft long metal bar. Thankfully, they ran off when i came downstairs in my PJ's clutching my son's hockey stick and turned on some lights. They were caught on our ring cameras and the police caught, arrested and charged them in the summer, along with 9 others.

They were a part of an Albanian gang who had been breaking into houses all around our area for approx 6 months. Of the people arrested, approx half were asylum seekers, and the remainder were either here illegally or had outstayed any legal right to remain.

Apart from scaring the living daylights out of my wife and son, it cost us an insurance claim of £2k for a new back door, of which i had to pay £400 directly and ongoing increased insurance premiums. My 14 year old son spent the week after the attempted break in sleeping on a mattress on our bedroom floor because he was so scared and my wife still wakes me up everytime the house creaks as it settles during the night.

That specific enough for you?

Sorry to hear that, it must have been distressing to say the least, the shock of that sort of incident can stay with a person for years. I hope your wife makes a full recovery, nobody should feel unsafe in their own home.

 

[Koolpc]

Foreign criminals are gaining a foothold in this country....the lefty woke brigade are the ones who have let this happen...100%.

And the bbc fail to report on it. Two tier reporting...

 

[fillyboy]

Foreign criminals are gaining a foothold in this country....the lefty woke brigade are the ones who have let this happen...100%.

And the bbc fail to report on it. Two tier reporting...

If the BBC did report on Lower's story, it would read 'man attacks migrants with hockey stick'.

 

[motorbiking]

If the BBC did report on Lower's story, it would read 'man attacks migrants with hockey stick'.

racist attack on desperate migrants.