Shows how untrustworthy the BBC are

[noseall]

I stopped paying my licence fee years ago.

Might be a good time for Trump fans to start paying it again....

I hope Don sues the crap out of em,

Beats having to buy his shítty bibles or tacky cards.

 

[Elsa TLC]

The orange rapist will love the fact she's getting death threats and will gladly sit back and let it happen.

Dont you like people of colour?

 

[noseall]

Dont you like people of colour?

Eh?

 

[morqthana]

Maybe he just stopped paying and still watches what he wants?

Maybe.

Do you think we should take heed of the opinions of criminals?

 

[morqthana]

First they were fake news, then a hoax, now the Epsteen files “prove nothing”. Trumpf must be getting worried.

Calls to release Epstein files grow as White House calls news emails hoax

Jeffrey Epstein said in 2018 he could "take down" Donald Trump, in an exchange released along with thousands of other files.

www.bbc.co.uk

And must be moving to neutralise possible witnesses https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2025/nov/14/us-politics-latest-news-donald-trump-ice-bishops-jeffrey-epstein?filterKeyEvents=false&page=with:block-6917c97c8f08a11c7389193c#block-6917c97c8f08a11c7389193c

 

[morqthana]

This is very much worth a read:

Trump can get away with saying what he likes about the BBC. But Epstein? That’s his one vulnerability | Jonathan Freedland

In attacking a vital broadcaster, the US president is once again holding others to standards he flouts. But the Maga faithful might not let his links to the disgraced financier go, says Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland

www.theguardian.com

It's partly about Trump as a whole, and partly about the BBC. And for anyone who reflexively says "Pah! Guardian-lefty-BBC-bias-loving nonsense", challenge yourself and read it. The parts about the BBC don't whitewash it or excuse it at all, for instance it talks about "Michael Prescott’s internal report and its more alarming findings of bias on a series of issues beyond the Panorama edit, from gender to Gaza."

 

[SPLINE]

Wonder which BBC presenters, shows, channels, directors, officers will have to go after the 5 billion payment?

 

[noseall]

Wonder which BBC presenters, shows, channels, directors, officers will have to go after the 5 billion payment?

Why don't you list them and see if folk agree?

 

[Notch7]

Wonder which BBC presenters, shows, channels, directors, officers will have to go after the 5 billion payment?

There won’t be any payment.

 

[Notch7]

Interesting how right wing muppets on here who happily watch GBnews, read the Telegraph, both of which selectively edit quotes or just downright lie on a daily basis are the ones screaming loudest about the BBC.


The Panorama programme which selectively edits Trumps speech creates the impression he incites violence and insurrection…….but Trump did incite violence, congressional hearings and courts have stated that repeatedly

 

[noseall]

There won’t be any payment.

We know. MBK has already stated Trump has a good case, so we can take it the case is doomed. Just humour him.

 

[noseall]

but Trump did incite violence,

And neither did the dodgy edit do him any reputational harm. It'll be just another TACO incident for the orange rapist.

 

[Notch7]

Michael Prescotts dossier that concludes the BBc had used selective editing…..uses selective editing to prove the point.

Funny how the Telegraph, GBnews, Daily Mail haven’t reported that.

The Prescott memo flunks the impartiality test​

The document at the heart of the BBC’s crisis is unfairly selective and ignores most of the corporation’s output​

Michael Prescotts report is hugely biased.

The Prescott memo flunks the impartiality test | The Observer

observer.co.uk

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Michael Prescotts dossier that concludes the BBc had used selective editing…..uses selective editing to prove the point.

Funny how the Telegraph, GBnews, Daily Mail haven’t reported that.

The Prescott memo flunks the impartiality test​

The document at the heart of the BBC’s crisis is unfairly selective and ignores most of the corporation’s output​

Michael Prescotts report is hugely biased.

The Prescott memo flunks the impartiality test | The Observer

observer.co.uk

Weaponised maybe ?

 

[blup]

Michael Prescotts dossier that concludes the BBc had used selective editing…..uses selective editing to prove the point.

Funny how the Telegraph, GBnews, Daily Mail haven’t reported that.

The Prescott memo flunks the impartiality test​

The document at the heart of the BBC’s crisis is unfairly selective and ignores most of the corporation’s output​

Michael Prescotts report is hugely biased.

The Prescott memo flunks the impartiality test | The Observer

observer.co.uk

If that is true the beeb must surely look into a breach of contract case against him