• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Shows how untrustworthy the BBC are

Status
Not open for further replies.
Take them out of your mouth. (y)
1763585927365.gif
 
Wow.

You can have any political views you want, but that's just the words of a russian bot

Blood on your hands, innocent British blood.

The struggle against islam is real, the only people fighting it are the likes of Trump and Farage. Everything the loony left do against Trump is a gift to muslims. The BBC and the Labour party, along with LWLs like yourself, have actively conspired to try to remove Trump from power. Foreign interference.
 
Compare the BBC reports at the time, to most other outlets world wide at the same time, before you accuse others of being gullible.

The attempted defence of Trump in here is unbelievable, especially when those same people purport to support law and order.
The unbelievably gullible left wing woke people in here believing the rubbish reported by media outlets is not at all unexpected...
 
The unbelievably gullible left wing woke people in here believing the rubbish reported by media outlets is not at all unexpected...
They have selected vision and hearing when it comes to Trump and turn a blind eye to the truth about anything that doesnt align with their twisted beliefs. They then turn their beliefs into insults towards you if you don't believe them too. You must be uneducated or thick to not think like them.
 
“and that this gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action.”

It’s so clear to anyone with half a brain.

Did the Trump make a direct call for violence? No that was a mistaken impression given by the edit.

You either agree or you are saying their correction is wrong.

They didn’t even qualify it. They apologised for giving the mistaken impression that Trump had made a direct call for violence.
Trumps full speech was a direct call for violence.

Trumps speech was insurrection.


The BBC apologised that the edit gave the mistaken impression that Trump made a call for violence. It does NOT prove that the overall speech was not a direct call for violence.



Please give up your pathetic conflation, you are just showing yourself to be dishonest
 
They have selected vision and hearing when it comes to Trump and turn a blind eye to the truth about anything that doesnt align with their twisted beliefs. They then turn their beliefs into insults towards you if you don't believe them too. You must be uneducated or thick to not think like them.

Trumps speech was inciting violence. That’s the TRUTH.

Congress voted a majority to say it was insurrection, the courts said it was insurrection, the judges said it was insurrection, various further studies and reports say it was insurrection
 
must be difficult for the far left trump haters to now have one of their main sources of information admitting they have been lying about him. They have all been taken as complete gullible fools
this is nonsense.

The BBC Panorama programme indicated Trump had incited violence it was an act of insurrection.

Trumps overall speech did incite violence and he did commit insurrection.


So come on Munroast explain how the BBC was lying.

Or are YOU going to be the liar and deny Trumps speech was an act of violence.
 
30 years today since the BBC aired the deceitful princess Diana interview..

Just watching on GMB the investigator says the interview possibly lead to her accident, 4 months after the BBC knew it was deceitful and didnt warn her about faked documents that her staff were spy's etc.
 
the BBC are saying their edit gave the impression Trump had made a direct call for violent action..............it doesnt mean the speech overall did not make a direct call to action

as usual you are using a logical fallacy
They apologised for giving the impression that he called for violence when in face it was true he called for violence? What nonsense.

Why would anyone need to apologise for giving the impression of the truth.
 
Why would anyone need to apologise for giving the impression of the truth.
Do you think Trump incited violence on Jan 6th?

bear in mind the following:



1763628925897.png


if you think he did not incite violence please explain why you know better than 57 senators



he was disqualified from ballot by 14th amendment on insurrection in 3 states -the Pro Trump supreme court over rulled



Colorado judge ruled it was insurrection https://www.politico.com/news/2023/...tion-but-can-still-run-for-president-00127909
 
Do you think Trump incited violence on Jan 6th?

bear in mind the following:



View attachment 399726

if you think he did not incite violence please explain why you know better than 57 senators



he was disqualified from ballot by 14th amendment on insurrection in 3 states -the Pro Trump supreme court over rulled



Colorado judge ruled it was insurrection https://www.politico.com/news/2023/...tion-but-can-still-run-for-president-00127909
He was acquitted.

And plenty of legal experts have said the speech fell short.

But try to stick to the topic old bean. BBC edit misled people and for that they have apologised.

Their edit gave the mistaken impression he made a direct call for violence.
 
He was acquitted.

And plenty of legal experts have said the speech fell short.

But try to stick to the topic old bean. BBC edit misled people and for that they have apologised.

Their edit gave the mistaken impression he made a direct call for violence.

No mistake to anyone with ears to hear the import of his words.

Only the deaf cannot hear. Only the dumb cannot understand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top