- Joined
- 25 Apr 2023
- Messages
- 9,284
- Reaction score
- 6,375
- Country

Take them out of your mouth.![]()


Take them out of your mouth.![]()

Wow.
You can have any political views you want, but that's just the words of a russian bot

The unbelievably gullible left wing woke people in here believing the rubbish reported by media outlets is not at all unexpected...Compare the BBC reports at the time, to most other outlets world wide at the same time, before you accuse others of being gullible.
The attempted defence of Trump in here is unbelievable, especially when those same people purport to support law and order.

They have selected vision and hearing when it comes to Trump and turn a blind eye to the truth about anything that doesnt align with their twisted beliefs. They then turn their beliefs into insults towards you if you don't believe them too. You must be uneducated or thick to not think like them.The unbelievably gullible left wing woke people in here believing the rubbish reported by media outlets is not at all unexpected...
Trumps full speech was a direct call for violence.“and that this gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action.”
It’s so clear to anyone with half a brain.
Did the Trump make a direct call for violence? No that was a mistaken impression given by the edit.
You either agree or you are saying their correction is wrong.
They didn’t even qualify it. They apologised for giving the mistaken impression that Trump had made a direct call for violence.
They have selected vision and hearing when it comes to Trump and turn a blind eye to the truth about anything that doesnt align with their twisted beliefs. They then turn their beliefs into insults towards you if you don't believe them too. You must be uneducated or thick to not think like them.
this is nonsense.must be difficult for the far left trump haters to now have one of their main sources of information admitting they have been lying about him. They have all been taken as complete gullible fools


They apologised for giving the impression that he called for violence when in face it was true he called for violence? What nonsense.the BBC are saying their edit gave the impression Trump had made a direct call for violent action..............it doesnt mean the speech overall did not make a direct call to action
as usual you are using a logical fallacy
Do you think Trump incited violence on Jan 6th?Why would anyone need to apologise for giving the impression of the truth.
"possibly" doing a lot of heavy liftingJust watching on GMB the investigator says the interview possibly lead to her accident

He was acquitted.Do you think Trump incited violence on Jan 6th?
bear in mind the following:
View attachment 399726
if you think he did not incite violence please explain why you know better than 57 senators
he was disqualified from ballot by 14th amendment on insurrection in 3 states -the Pro Trump supreme court over rulled
Colorado judge ruled it was insurrection https://www.politico.com/news/2023/...tion-but-can-still-run-for-president-00127909

No one knows for sure...."possibly" doing a lot of heavy lifting
GMB is a bit like Hello magazine
He was acquitted.
And plenty of legal experts have said the speech fell short.
But try to stick to the topic old bean. BBC edit misled people and for that they have apologised.
Their edit gave the mistaken impression he made a direct call for violence.