Sorry, but this is important.

She's still a woman despite your denials of her gender.
Most of the other female medical staff were not bothered, and accepted her in her adopted gender.
There was only one female worker who objected to her presence.
One who didn't mind rocking the boat you mean.
 
She's still a woman despite your denials of her gender.
Most of the other female medical staff were not bothered, and accepted her in her adopted gender.
There was only one female worker who objected to her presence.

That is not true.

Not one of your three claims.

BTW, you have "accidentally" skipped away from "sex" (fact) and climbed onto the nebulous fantasy of "gender."
 
She's still a woman despite your denials of her gender.
Most of the other female medical staff were not bothered, and accepted her in her adopted gender.
There was only one female worker who objected to her presence.
Yes just the one

Screenshot_20260217_122857_Chrome.jpg
 
Good for nurse Peggie, why should she have to get changed in front of a man.

There was no compulsion for her to do so.
Dr Upton is and was recognised as a woman. And there were alternatives available to Nurse Peggie.
According to reports on the tribunal, alternative locations to change were available to Nurse Sandie Peggie.
 
You've adopted the lie invented by the Sun newspaper, and JohnD was quick to thank you for it.
Based on the tribunal proceedings, Dr. Beth Upton indicated that if a patient requested a female doctor, they should be assigned one, as she did not believe in forcing a patient to see a specific doctor, although she asserted her identity as a woman and defended her right to use female facilities.
 
Last edited:
I wonder what the law is is Britain and has been since at least the 2010 Equality Act?

"A pivotal moment came in April when the UK Supreme Court clarified the law on gender, unanimously ruling that a woman is defined by biological sex under the Equality Act.

"The concept of sex is binary, a person is either a woman or a man," wrote the judges, adding that "the ordinary meaning of those plain and unambiguous words" was self-explanatory and required "no further explanation".

Billy and morqthana disagree.
 
Perhaps he made it up, like the lie about Mrs Rowling.

He's getting desperate now, trying to paint anyone who supports the rights of women to have women-only spaces as an "anti-trans activist"

I don't want men going into women's changing rooms at all, whether they're old perverts like Donald Trump, or fantasists like Doctor Upton.
 
I found it quite appalling.
That's because, like Nurse Peggie, your an anti-trans activist, and you use emotive and misleading language in your anti-trans campaign.
You're unable to dicuss the isues on a fair and balanced basis. You're so religiously or ideologically opposed to transsexuals that you're incapable of treating the issue with the intelligent sensitivity it deserves.
 
OK, for several years, while they are transitioning, from male to female, which invariably includes adopting the female dress attire, they continue to use the male facilities until the transitioning process is complete.
Do you think it's safe for someone, to all intents and purposes to use the male facilities?

Now what about those women transitioning to male? Does the same apply? Do they, appearing as a man, continue to use the women's facilities, for several years until their transitioning is complete?
Are we still talking about babies ? You are jumping all over the place in your excited state. Calm yourself down.
 
There was no compulsion for her to do so.
Dr Upton is and was recognised as a woman. And there were alternatives available to Nurse Peggie.
Not a 'real' woman though!! Anyone can claim to be one.

Anyone can claim to be a Corgi....except me, as I am a real Corgi! Woof!!
 
Back
Top