Capital Punishment

You're doing your impersonation of a pigeon playing chess. You've lost, so you scatter all the pieces, crap on the board, and strut all over it as though you've won. :rolleyes:
Won, Won what ? surely you cannot be thinking I have had some petty war of wits against you? Good lord get a grip of yourself, this is about right and wrong, I was right and you was wrong it is that simple. Take your silly pigeon analogy and make a pie out of it, as you eat it you will find that it turns into humble pie. Take a big slice you fool.
Charge it !!!!!
 
Last edited:
Pipe down Billy and stop repeating what I have schooled you in as if it is somehow you that has pointed this out. Get a grip on yourself as it is embarrassing to see. Just accept and move on.
Because...
It's like he didn't understand what an aggravated offence was and then tried to tell you what you already knew. Offence + aggravating factor = aggravated offence.

It quite ridiculous to keep saying car theft is not an aggravated offence when he's already been told it can be.
 
It's like he didn't understand what an aggravated offence was and then tried to tell you what you already knew. Offence + aggravating factor = aggravated offence.

It quite ridiculous to keep saying car theft is not an aggravated offence when he's already been told it can be.
I find it bizarre that he has the brass neck to accuse me of having a lack of comprehension and he then does this...
 
It's like he didn't understand what an aggravated offence was and then tried to tell you what you already knew. Offence + aggravating factor = aggravated offence.

It quite ridiculous to keep saying car theft is not an aggravated offence when he's already been told it can be.

Maybe he was separating out in his mind the theft bit from the later aggravating factors. Rookie mistake. But we've all done it.
 
I've known experienced barristers to do it. I just give them a pep talk and take them back to first principles.
I would feel completely cheated if you had to do that to my barrister who I was paying to defend me.
Charge it !!!!!
 
You're asking for a logical explanation for an illogical comment.

I'm asking for a justification for the accusation that noseall is an IRA apologist.

If Mottie doesn't have one then he's guilty of making an appalling personal attack, motivated entirely by personal animosity, the very epitome of an ad hominem comment.
 
Back
Top