My Reform voting acquaintance told me last night that another twelve million immigrants will be added to the UK population by 2034. He's a clever guy. But he would not listen to reason. How can this sort of nonsense be countered.
How many newly-elected Deformists have been suspended or ejected so far?
- Thread starter JohnD
- Start date
Don't change your name to Poirot anytime soon Monsieur Clouseau.
So are all members of all other parties behaving impeccably?
It's a new party, expanded in a hurry. There are bound to be issues.
The public don't care, the obvious evidence is last week's election results.
It's a new party, expanded in a hurry. There are bound to be issues.
The public don't care, the obvious evidence is last week's election results.
Incredible the attrition rate for a fledgling party. These are the front runners too. They will be replaced with even worse dross.
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 2,967
- Reaction score
- 159
- Country
Over what time period?
Cyril Smith's offences date back to the 1960s.
John was listing the Reform members that have been exposed and binned over the last few weeks.
The rate of expulsions of reform members over the time period used by John for a similar time period as that you've listed, isn't sustainable, there aren't that many members.
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 2,967
- Reaction score
- 159
- Country
I thought I was supposed to be an AI BOT, or Himmie, or some other forum members double identity.
I don't mind these multiple roles, in fact I quite enjoy them.
We need to accept something as the electorate, I'm not saying it's right that we need to accept it, however we do.
We are never, ever, going to have a major political party that is near 100% squeaky clean when it comes to the goings on of their top tiers of people. If nothing else the law of averages says there will always be some that are in the political swamp and/or have dodgy things in their past/current life.
That's the reality and it ain't going to change.
So where does that leave us? I suppose we need to focus on how effectively and efficiently they deliver for the British people. Of course, we have an issue there also. That issue being our governments of late have been p1ss poor in terms of effectiveness and efficiency.
I don't doubt Reform will be any different if they gain power. There will be scandals, there will be wrong 'uns. However what I'd be interested to see is whether or not they can be any better at actually delivering for us. I suspect the answer will be no, however who knows.
Meanwhile, up here, we have this kind of sh1te going on ...
en.wikipedia.org
We are never, ever, going to have a major political party that is near 100% squeaky clean when it comes to the goings on of their top tiers of people. If nothing else the law of averages says there will always be some that are in the political swamp and/or have dodgy things in their past/current life.
That's the reality and it ain't going to change.
So where does that leave us? I suppose we need to focus on how effectively and efficiently they deliver for the British people. Of course, we have an issue there also. That issue being our governments of late have been p1ss poor in terms of effectiveness and efficiency.
I don't doubt Reform will be any different if they gain power. There will be scandals, there will be wrong 'uns. However what I'd be interested to see is whether or not they can be any better at actually delivering for us. I suspect the answer will be no, however who knows.
Meanwhile, up here, we have this kind of sh1te going on ...
Q Manivannan - Wikipedia
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 2,967
- Reaction score
- 159
- Country
the problem with UK politics is the persistent and invariable pendulum effect, swing from right to left, back again, and occasionally swinging further to the left or right, every 5 years.
In addition the adversarial setup often acts more like an antagonistic approach.
What's shoite about it?Meanwhile, up here, we have this kind of sh1te going on ...
Q Manivannan - Wikipedia
I'm not getting into the back and forth.
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 2,967
- Reaction score
- 159
- Country
Obviously, you have an opinion,but you are unwilling to share that opinion.
Does it matter then? Are historic crimes not important?
- Joined
- 30 May 2024
- Messages
- 5,079
- Reaction score
- 2,025
- Country
Billy knows
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 2,967
- Reaction score
- 159
- Country
Of course it matters. And historic crimes are important, that is why the time periods are important.
If something happens biennial, compared to something else which happens weekly, there is an obvious difference between the high probability of the one thing happening next week, but not the other.
- Joined
- 30 May 2024
- Messages
- 5,079
- Reaction score
- 2,025
- Country
Ask him this when he bangs on about slavery
