Henry Nowak inquest...

To be fair, an eye witness was heard shouting, "He's trying to cut his head off,".
Yes, I saw that, and that is where the rumour emanated from, eagerly exploited by those who want to imply some sort of ISIS inspired motivation for the attack.
The actual report, in the Sun, a paper with a reputation built on anti-immigration, was:
One witness could be heard shouting: “He’s trying to cut his head off.”
No name, no reference to any real individual, etc, just "one witness".
Was the Sun there to witness this comment? Or was it reported to them by A N Other?
Or was it the start of a rumour intended to involve other issues?
 
the worst thing about such prophecy is plenty of loons will attempt to make it come tru.
Self-fulfilling prophecy.
Demonise an ethnicity, then assign anything remotely resembling the prophecy, and there will be claims of "we told you so", then the hate, the violence builds to create the perfect storm.
 
Self-fulfilling prophecy.
Demonise an ethnicity, then assign anything remotely resembling the prophecy, and there will be claims of "we told you so", then the hate, the violence builds to create the perfect storm.
Religions have used that excuse for centuries.

This lot are just a cu*t.
 
The self-fulfilling prophecy process is not limited to religions.
No, it is not.
And Enoch was talking about the times in which he lived - not some open ended vision of the 21st century.

The Gumbies have found their prophet, are attempting to make Nowak a martyr and ready to ordain Fartrage as their Heirophant.
 
No, it is not.
And Enoch was talking about the times in which he lived - not some open ended vision of the 21st century.

The Gumbies have found their prophet, are attempting to make Nowak a martyr and ready to ordain Fartrage as their Heirophant.
He gave the views up to the year 2000 in his speech from 1964, the sheer genius of what he was talking about then is very relevant today, only a blind fool can ignore it and twist it into a racist comment.
 
I've asked Ivor to post up this DEI training, which he claims repeatedly to have seen, but so far, zilch, nada, zero, rien.

It's Ivor's typical nonsense, which you have believed without seeing any evidence. :rolleyes:
Shut up Himmy!
What the hell do you know?
Your only source of information is the internet, we live in the real world where we see things and other people.
As usual you're trying to excuse a callous criminals just because he's one of your favourite.
Had he been a white English criminal...
Or maybe I'm wrong, you support and encourage all criminals, regardless of their ethnicity.
 
I'm not getting upset...

But if you don't understand the relevance then it must be another option...

You're simply ignorant! :LOL:
I still have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

Relevance...option...ignorant! (smiley)

Are you trying to appear unhinged? If so you're doing well.
 
He gave the views up to the year 2000 in his speech from 1964, the sheer genius of what he was talking about then is very relevant today, only a blind fool can ignore it and twist it into a racist comment.
Only a deluded disciple of his would say so.
 
"What does this resolve? What does this actually do? Burning cars out, wrecking your own community and now one of their own has just lost their home."

A man who watched his house burn down during the riots in Belfast asks questions Fartrage and his followers prefer to avoid.
 
His speech is bang on the money, it was controversial then as it is today to those that prefer to ignore.
Have you considered he was warning against white communities ignoring the immigrants and persecuting them with racist slogans, rather than welcoming them into the country?
 
I've asked Ivor to post up this DEI training, which he claims repeatedly to have seen, but so far, zilch, nada, zero, rien.

It's Ivor's typical nonsense, which you have believed without seeing any evidence. :rolleyes:
It's all over the media, on various sources, you could find it if you could be bothered and weren't just looking for an excuse to deny reality. The training guide telling them to basically adjust the arrest rate to ensure that the outcomes are racially balanced.

In other words, as the tiny percentage of the population who do 50% of the stabbings all have one obvious physical characteristic then the police should stop arresting, searching or pursuing this one visually obvious group so that the crime statistics become more aligned to the idealist claptrap that some morons pretend to believe about everyone being equal.

At one time we had inequality, ethnic minorities were excluded and disadvantaged, it was terrible. Then we embraced equality, everyone was equal. But we found out that some minorities just weren't good enough for many jobs and kept committing a vastly disproportionate number of crimes. The answer it seems was DEI - where employers are required to hire less capable minorities even if it damages their business, and the police are required to overlook crimes so we can all pretend that all is well and everyone's equal.

DEI is racist in itself, and is also appears to be an admission that those promoting it actually think that minorities really are inferior so need a leg-up.
 
Back
Top