Lucy Letby case - Evidence discussion thread

[Highway Man]

Says who?

Says the world leading experts in the field, not a builder from Essex

 

[mikehammer69]

That is my point. It all rests upon who you believe

She's most likely guilty as she was convicted by a jury

The who believe she's innocent make lots of noise and the general public can end up confused as to her guilt or innocence.

 

[Highway Man]

She's most likely guilty as she was convicted by a jury

The jury is only made up of ordinary folk listening to the evidence they were presented with at the time.

 

[noseall]

Says the world leading experts in the field

Still just as irrelevant.

It would take some new and compelling evidence, just to raise an eyebrow. The opinions of naive onlookers like yourself, matter not a jot in that respect.

Don't expect to see Lucy out of prison any day soon.

 

[Highway Man]

Still just as irrelevant.



Don't expect to see Lucy out of prison any day soon.

I am sure she realises that, still doesn't make it right

 

[ellal]

I'm not arguing for or against her conviction, in fact, I find the whole case a bit - odd.

I'm saying opinions of onlookers, whether that are 'experts' or otherwise, are irrelevant. New and compelling evidence does.

The case is indeed odd, given that the evidence of some experts have been called into question...

And the recent revelations have not been from 'onlookers' but from respected experts questioning the 'facts' originally put forward or indeed the evidence that was excluded...

Thus new and compelling evidence that should be heard in open court...

So not too dissimilar to the miscarriages of justice I mentioned...

But 'authority' and the medical boards tend to fight tooth and nail if their decisions are questioned...

One wonders if the Public Office (Accountability) Bill when it finally becomes law will make a difference in future, but sadly there is not a retro active aspect.

 

[noseall]

Thus new and compelling evidence that should be heard in open court.

I'm sure it will be considered, should any materialise.

 

[Highway Man]

I'm sure it will be considered, should any materialise.

Here comes the back peddling. Expected. Next!!!!

 

[noseall]

troll post

 

[Highway Man]

Only in your narrow minded view. Next !!!!

 

[blup]

L

Says the world leading experts in the field, not a builder from Essex

Reported

 

[blup]

The case is indeed odd, given that the evidence of some experts have been called into question...

And the recent revelations have not been from 'onlookers' but from respected experts questioning the 'facts' originally put forward or indeed the evidence that was excluded...

Thus new and compelling evidence that should be heard in open court...

So not too dissimilar to the miscarriages of justice I mentioned...

But 'authority' and the medical boards tend to fight tooth and nail if their decisions are questioned...

One wonders if the Public Office (Accountability) Bill when it finally becomes law will make a difference in future, but sadly there is not a retro active aspect.

Massive policy changes will be brought into the nhs on the basis of the report’s recommendations and then have to change when or if LL is deemed innocent. Then there will be calls for another public inquiry

 

[blup]

One wonders if the Public Office (Accountability) Bill when it finally becomes law will make a difference in future, but sadly there is not a retro active aspect.

Can’t see that doing much, those at the top in the public sector have a remarkable ability to see and hear nothing.

 

[Trazor]

Massive policy changes will be brought into the nhs on the basis of the report’s recommendations and then have to change when or if LL is deemed innocent. Then there will be calls for another public inquiry

If I hear, "lessons will be learned", ever again, I will throw up.

 

[blup]

If I hear, "lessons will be learned", ever again, I will throw up.

I think part of the problem is that the high level recommendations are only partially implemented and those that are get turned into “policies” rather changes in attitude