A bold choice of thread with so many neanderthal trolls in this forum these days.

Only by you leftysYou're going to find yourself shunned on here, I think.
Only by you leftys

I care not if someone completely transforms themselves, Personally I wouldnt marry or go out with someone who had but I have no problems with anyone that does. The ones I have a problem with are the ones who identify as women and they are not.No, the opposite.
I think so anyway.
But I am happy to admit that I struggle with this issue.
I care not if someone completely transforms themselves, Personally I wouldnt marry or go out with someone who had but I have no problems with anyone that does. The ones I have a problem with are the ones who identify as women and they are not.

I believe in live and let live, I dont judge people for what they want to do providing it. isnt interfering with meI have no fixed views but I am interested in what others have to say on this topic.
People who argue that a trans woman is a biological woman or to be treated as such.Who are "they"?
Offering breast feeding and other female only health and biological conditions to non biological women. Or calling women who breast feed, people who breast feed. As if thinking you are in the “wrong” body means you must be a biological woman or should be treated exactly as if you were.Would you like an example of discrimination against a biological woman?
The issue is overwhelmingly with trans women, there will be far fewer circumstances where they will be justifiably excluded.This person is biologically a woman.
![]()
![]()
He's had chest surgery, hormone treatment which has given him facial hair and a deep voice, but no genital surgery.
As a biological woman, it's allowable to exclude him from single-sex spaces dedicated to men.
I think most women would be alarmed at his presence in their changing room. So in a private changing cubicle in a shared gender space probably.But the Supreme Court also ruled that trans men can be lawfully excluded from a female-only service "where reasonable objection is taken to their presence, for example, because the gender reassignment process has given them a masculine appearance or attributes to which reasonable objection might be taken in the context of the women-only service being provided".
So he can be excluded from, say, a men's changing room because he wasn't born with a penis, and also from the women's because he's grown a beard.
Where is he supposed to go?

Exactly,, Think on...

god only knowsWhy would he not want that?
Why would anybody?
As a 30+ years schoolie, I'd love to know which charities are 'recruiting' children for anything in schools.Unfortunately, children are easily influenced and we must keep them safe from "charities" who see schools as recruiting grounds.

Your not allowed to joke. If you do! Your far right and just a evil as Aldof Hitler.Thats a joke
Same here.Then yes. I have no problem with that senario
As a 30+ years schoolie, I'd love to know which charities are 'recruiting' children for anything in schools.

So no vicarious problems/judging of people you don't know, who aren't interfering with you, in spaces "belonging" to people you don't know, in circumstances you don't know.I believe in live and let live, I dont judge people for what they want to do providing it. isnt interfering with me