Capital Punishment

MNW67 said:
I've known experienced barristers to do it. I just give them a pep talk and take them back to first principles.
Click to expand...
I would feel completely cheated if you had to do that to my barrister who I was paying to defend me.
Charge it !!!!!
 
King Billy said:
You're asking for a logical explanation for an illogical comment.
Click to expand...

I'm asking for a justification for the accusation that noseall is an IRA apologist.

If Mottie doesn't have one then he's guilty of making an appalling personal attack, motivated entirely by personal animosity, the very epitome of an ad hominem comment.
 
Mottie said:
Don’t care. Tell me, what would your punishment for a child murderer be?

This is where ellal quietly disappears into the ether…..
Click to expand...
Yep, gone to ground. Only reply I’ll get to that will be some sort of personal attack calling me a thug troll or some such swervy shyte. I can read him like a book.
 
Highway Man said:
I would feel completely cheated if you had to do that to my barrister who I was paying to defend me.
Charge it !!!!!
Click to expand...
Some of the very best play the fool to sucker the other side. It’s an extremely successful tactic
 
Highway Man said:
I am all for capital and corporal punishment, I think the punishment should fit the crime, obviously for any concerns over guilt is to be avoided and prison but this must be hard labour and not a soft option. Violent offences such as agravated burglary and theft of cars etc, should be met with lashes of substansial proportions to inflict not just pain but to mark the offender. I spent a bit of time in Thailand where they have very severe penantys for drugs and crime in general.
Click to expand...
If we took the same approach there won't be any politicians left to run the country...
 
Highway Man said:
Safe gaurds would need to be put in place where capital punishment could only be used for the found 100% guilty before they even reach a trial. Anything less than 100% must be a hard labour sentence.
Click to expand...
I'm interested in Highwayman's suggestion that when an accused is not found guilty beyond reasonable doubt, he should be sentenced to imprisonment with hard labour.

And that when a person is considered to be guilty, no trial is necessary before deciding to kill him.
 
JohnD said:
I'm interested in Highwayman's suggestion that when an accused is not found guilty beyond reasonable doubt, he should be sentenced to imprisonment with hard labour.

And that when a person is considered to be guilty, no trial is necessary before deciding to kill him.
Click to expand...
Exactly that, if there are crimes that have been commited that doesn't require a trial to prove guilt, then just sentence them to death.
 
JohnD said:
I'm interested in Highwayman's suggestion that when an accused is not found guilty beyond reasonable doubt, he should be sentenced to imprisonment with hard labour.

And that when a person is considered to be guilty, no trial is necessary before deciding to kill him.
Click to expand...

Technically what is the point of a trial if two blokes are filmed beheading a soldier on the streets of London ???

Or some bloke stabbing Joe cox in broad day light
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
What about a referendum
3 4 5
Replies
67
Views
4K
Notch7
N
D
Here's why I don't support the death sentence
2 3 4
Replies
45
Views
4K
Pat ex
P
B
Total Scum jailed for snapping tot's spine.
2 3
Replies
38
Views
6K
Sylvan Tieger
S
D
More pathetic sentencing
2 3
Replies
40
Views
5K
diy_fun_uk
D
B
  • Locked
'I'd rather employ a paedophile than ex-forces personnel!'
14 15 16
Replies
238
Views
29K
conny
C
Back
Top