Ginger men who now identifies as a woman.

JohnD · Wednesday at 12:46 PM

King Billy said:
More strawmen arguments. is that all you've got?

It's not an argument, it's a question.

JohnD · Wednesday at 12:49 PM

King Billy said:
Strange that the police forces have no record of such instances,

And now you tell us that the police records do not show them because of privacy laws?

So your claim is worthless.

Did you hope to get away with it?

King Billy · Wednesday at 12:50 PM

JohnD said:
It's not an argument, it's a question.

It's a question based on an argument that you imagined.
No-one claimed to have interrogated the police records.

JohnD · Wednesday at 12:51 PM

pete01 said:
Yes a bit off topic accept my deepest apologies

What makes him assume that it was not a pervert using the toilet for nefarious reasons? Or that it was a transman wearing a dress? Do they do that?

JohnD · Wednesday at 12:51 PM

King Billy said:
It's a question based on ana argument that you imagined.
No-one claimed to have interrogated the police records.

But you falsely implied that absence of records indicated absence of complaints.

pete01 · Wednesday at 12:52 PM

JohnD said:
What makes him assume that it was not a pervert using the toilet for nefarious reasons?

Exactly, hes delusional.

King Billy · Wednesday at 12:54 PM

JohnD said:
And now you tell us that the police records do not show them because of privacy laws?

More misunderstanding of what was said.

men entering women’s toilets under false pretenses is rarely isolated in public reporting due to privacy laws.

The mata data would not be limited by privacy laws.

JohnD said:
So your claim is worthless.

Worth more than your supposed evidence.
I'm still waiting.

JohnD · Wednesday at 12:55 PM

Why is the pro-Trans lobby obsessed with letting men into women's toilets?

King Billy · Wednesday at 12:56 PM

JohnD said:
What makes him assume that it was not a pervert using the toilet for nefarious reasons? Or that it was a transman wearing a dress? Do they do that?

I didn't.
I said it could have been a transman, Which means they would be perfectly entitled, even obliged, to use the female toilets.

Did you ignore that bit?

JohnD · Wednesday at 12:58 PM

King Billy said:
I said it could have been a transman,

Why would a transman be wearing a dress?

King Billy · Wednesday at 12:58 PM

JohnD said:
But you falsely implied that absence of records indicated absence of complaints.

You mean that complaints may have been made, but no record was produced?
That's highly unlikely.

You claimed you'd witnessed many occurrences of such events. Did you report such events?

King Billy · Wednesday at 12:59 PM

JohnD said:
Why is the pro-Trans lobby obsessed with letting men into women's toilets?

Another question based on a Strawman argument again.

JohnD · Wednesday at 1:01 PM

JohnD said:
Why is the pro-Trans lobby obsessed with letting men into women's toilets?

Does nobody know?

King Billy · Wednesday at 1:01 PM

JohnD said:
Why would a transman be wearing a dress?

You've lost the plot.
No-one suggested a tansman would be wearing a dress.
So i think we can describe this one as yet another strawman argument.
They're coming thick and fast now.

Ivor Windybottom · Wednesday at 1:01 PM

John D vs King Billy in a battle of "last word". This may take some time.

Ginger men who now identifies as a woman.

Similar threads