Another attack

diy_fun_uk said:
I don't claim to, I have. Fact, not assertion. I will however say not to any great extent.
Click to expand...
And mild discrimination can have a large effect on some, creating the scenario of their withdrawal, which can become an ever increasing circle of cause and effect.

diy_fun_uk said:
This mental health bandwagon thing is getting out of control. Are there folk out there with serious mental health issues? Yes, of course. Should they be helped? Yes, of course. Should they be in secure units and not in the community if deemed a possible risk to others? Yes, of course, however much of that was scrapped under care in the community, which is a dangerous policy in some cases.
Click to expand...
So he, and his victims were considered less important than the cost of such care?

diy_fun_uk said:
As for the 9 years sentence and serving 4.5, what a complete farce of a sentence. But then what do we expect when, increasingly, the sentences that are dished out are pathetically short.
Click to expand...
Maybe prison wasn't the right place for him, but given the comment above, maybe it was the cheaper option.
If society creates such people, and doesn't take into account the result of such people walking around, what does society expect?

In the animal kingdom, such anomalies would be killed or excluded.
But we're not animals, we take care of our sick, injured, and incapable people. Or so we claim.
 
King Billy said:
It's a typical 'cult' type group. Nothing to do with religion.
The reason for the investigation was mainly sex abuse, forced marriage, etc.
If you want to be informed via social media, you'd better wear your coloured specs'. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
BS
It is a military style training camp and the narrative of mainly sex abuse, forced marriage, is a cover story for the dummies that want to believe it. We know your google doesn’t work the same as everyone else’s but anyone can google it and you will find vids secretly recorded by scared neighbours.
 
aveatry said:
BS
It is a military style training camp and the narrative of mainly sex abuse, forced marriage, is a cover story for the dummies that want to believe it. We know your google doesn’t work the same as everyone else’s but anyone can google it and you will find vids secretly recorded by scared neighbours.
Click to expand...
They've been affected by chem trails.
 
King Billy said:
And mild discrimination can have a large effect on some, creating the scenario of their withdrawal, which can become an ever increasing circle of cause and effect.

So he, and his victims were considered less important than the cost of such care?

Maybe prison wasn't the right place for him, but given the comment above, maybe it was the cheaper option.
If society creates such people, and doesn't take into account the result of such people walking around, what does society expect?

In the animal kingdom, such anomalies would be killed or excluded.
But we're not animals, we take care of our sick, injured, and incapable people. Or so we claim.
Click to expand...

You're nothing but a whole lot of wrong if your 'mental health issues' lead you to attack innocent people. Get 'em locked up in the proverbial (or actual if needed) padded cell and keep 'em off the streets.

More and more it's about the poor perpetrators and what led them to commit their crimes. Less and less focus on the victims. P1ss poor sentencing etc.

That idiot leading the Greens re-tweeted a message about the police being too heavy handed when they were trying to stop the nut job!
 
diy_fun_uk said:
You're nothing but a whole lot of wrong if your 'mental health issues' lead you to attack innocent people. Get 'em locked up in the proverbial (or actual if needed) padded cell and keep 'em off the streets.

More and more it's about the poor perpetrators and what led them to commit their crimes. Less and less focus on the victims. P1ss poor sentencing etc.
Click to expand...
If the mentally unstable people were properly treated, or detained, there wouldn't be any, or as many, victims.

diy_fun_uk said:
That idiot leading the Greens re-tweeted a message about the police being too heavy handed when they were trying to stop the nut job!
Click to expand...
He was incapacitated by a taser.
Was the kick to the head really necessary?

When a brown man in an airport does it, it's an aggravated crime. When a policeman does it, it's necessary.
Do you not think there is an imbalance there?
 
King Billy said:
If the mentally unstable people were properly treated, or detained, there wouldn't be any, or as many, victims.
Click to expand...

Exactly and that is why we need to detain - lock up every single boat arrival until we have established who they are and their history.
 
aveatry said:
Exactly and that is why we need to detain - lock up every single boat arrival until we have established who they are and their history.
Click to expand...
An assessment is sufficient to identify anyone displaying dangerous intentions.
Locking up people for no reason is self-defeating, morally reprehensible and illegal.
Evidently that wouldn't bother you.
 
Lower said:
Interesting that people seem to think the police used too much force to wrestle the knife off the terrorist. I'm glad that Mark Rowley has actually stood up to Zac Polanski over his comments about it.

Also interesting for the people that think the police used too much force, that if this attack had happened in most European countries or America, he would have been shot rather than kicked until he dropped the knife.
Click to expand...
100%. In other countries the attacker would have bullets in him not a taser needle. I still think our police are too soft on these criminals, they world has changed and they need to change with the level of threat. No law abiding citizen would worry about police carrying firearms, our police are highly trained and I for one would be confident they would use them on the right people. If you don't engage in crime, you will be fine. Simple but true formula.
 
 
King Billy said:
He was incapacitated by a taser.
Was the kick to the head really necessary?

When a brown man in an airport does it, it's an aggravated crime. When a policeman does it, it's necessary.
Do you not think there is an imbalance there?
Click to expand...
He had just stabbed two people.
He was an immediate threat to others.
He didn't immediately comply.
Adequate and appropriate force was used.

What approach should the police have taken? Offered him a cuppa and a biccy?

When a brown man in an airport does what? When a policeman does what? The former is most likely committing a crime, the latter is upholding the law. There's no imbalance.

Too easy for folk these days to say 'it's my mental health ...'
 
diy_fun_uk said:
He had just stabbed two people.
He was an immediate threat to others.
He didn't immediately comply.
Adequate and appropriate force was used.

What approach should the police have taken? Offered him a cuppa and a biccy?

When a brown man in an airport does what? When a policeman does what? The former is most likely committing a crime, the latter is upholding the law. There's no imbalance.

Too easy for folk these days to say 'it's my mental health ...'
Click to expand...
And he was also wearing a rucksack containing who knows what ! He needed to be incapacitated by any means as fast as possible he is lucky that the police were not properly armed.
 
diy_fun_uk said:
He had just stabbed two people.
He was an immediate threat to others.
He didn't immediately comply.
Adequate and appropriate force was used.

What approach should the police have taken? Offered him a cuppa and a biccy?

When a brown man in an airport does what? When a policeman does what? The former is most likely committing a crime, the latter is upholding the law. There's no imbalance.

Too easy for folk these days to say 'it's my mental health ...'
Click to expand...
Bit of a mismatch in the reports.
Were they struggling to wrest the knife from him
the officers can be seen kicking the man in the head several times in the struggle to wrest the knife from him.
Click to expand...
Or was he refusing to show his hands? In which case how could they know he was holding a knife?
Even after being Tasered, he "refused to show his hands,
Click to expand...
Why shouldn't the IOPC look into it?
Why should it not even be considered?
Is it going to become acceptable that police immediately resort to kicking people in the head during arrest?

How long before people become instantly violent. fearing for their safety, when faced by the police using excessive force?
Amaaz is said to have raised and moved his head on the floor and that in response PC Marsden kicked him to the face and brought his foot down towards the top of his head in what appeared to be a stamping motion.
Click to expand...
 
aveatry said:
And he was also wearing a rucksack containing who knows what ! He needed to be incapacitated by any means as fast as possible he is lucky that the police were not properly armed.
Click to expand...
He was incapacitated already by the taser, otherwise he would have taken defensive postures to protect his head. He didn't and couldn''t because he was incapacitated
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
UK's Dumbest Drug Dealer?
Replies
1
Views
1K
JBR
JBR
T
Sebastian Kaliniwoski
Replies
10
Views
945
johnny2007
johnny2007
M
SCUM BAGS
2 3
Replies
33
Views
4K
Softus
S
B
Rodney King 2?
2
Replies
17
Views
3K
imamartian
I
L
More Police brutality.
2
Replies
21
Views
4K
Thermo
Thermo
Back
Top