£24Bn and 200,000 job losses in oil and gas.

Sponsored Links
Adding more generation just means more economy of scale.
I already addressed this. With intermittent sources, one installs so many wind turbines/solar panels, and the price falls. However, when your grid has a high enough penetration of intermittent sources, you have to build a great deal of redundancy and storage to meet demand (including baseload supply), resulting in that cheap price suddenly not being cheap.

I have some example figures in a book, if I can remember to dig it out at a later time.
But I thought Xlinks was PV rather than thermal.
I changed it to PV later, but the point still stands. You still need the infrastructure I described.

We need nuclear, and the opposition to it is based upon fear, and nothing else.
 
We need nuclear, and the opposition to it is based upon fear, and nothing else.
Mine is based on price and time. I'm all for it if it can compete.

Also, with high percentage of renewables baseload isn't a thing. You don't want, need or benefit from inflexible always on systems.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top