• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Age of installation

... harmonisation of the the cable colours was nothing to do with Part Pee.
What I always remember was a course I went on about 2005, and the instructor explained that the way it's going to remain apparent whether an installation was likely to have been installed after the new regulations came into force, and therefore had probably needed to be notified through BC was the obvious change of colour.

You may think it was just a coincidence that the two changes in the electrical industry came about around the same time, some would disagree.
 
What I always remember was a course I went on about 2005, and the instructor explained that the way it's going to remain apparent whether an installation was likely to have been installed after the new regulations came into force, and therefore had probably needed to be notified through BC was the obvious change of colour. .... You may think it was just a coincidence that the two changes in the electrical industry came about around the same time, some would disagree.
Whilst what you are implying would obviously make some sense, I suspect that it really was essentially a pure coincidence. The change to harmonised colours for non-flexible cables was very long in the planning, and the date of change was very probably decided long before anyone had even dreamed about a 'Part P' - don't forget that those harmonised colours had been introduced for flexible cables very many years (decades) earlier
 
And, unusually, this particular change (permitted colours) had a two year time scale not six months.
So as an indicator of "possible" OK but not a chance of any "certainty", the colour changed bridged Part P which allowed either colour scheme both before and after Part P came about.
You might look at paperwork and see an outstanding number of installations that were "officially done" before Part P and notice a great big spike in statistics, far greater than random chance might suggest.
It is not for me to suggest that some juggling around with dates was used to circumvent some aspects of Part P.

Edited to note - The permitted colours of fixed wiring became many years after the permitted colours for flexes (at that time it bcame very common to hear "Only for Flexes never for fixed wiring!") .
Hooh how wrong they were!
 
Last edited:
I wonder if this installation is earlier than the fuseboard

How old is the property?
 
You might look at paperwork and see an outstanding number of installations that were "officially done" before Part P and notice a great big spike in statistics, far greater than random chance might suggest.
Indeed so - and I have a feeling that it may only have been necessary to be able to argue that the work had been 'designed' prior to the advent of Part P to be 'exempt' from it, even if the work were actually done appreciably later.
It is not for me to suggest that some juggling around with dates was used to circumvent some aspects of Part P.
I don't really think that anyone could criticise you for making such a suggestion, even if you did ;)

Kind Regards, John
 
It was nothing to do with Part P.
'Officially', it obviously wasn't. The question being debated is that of whether the interesting 'co-incidence of implementation dates' may have been in some ways 'manipulated'.

As I recently wrote, I suspect that the dates for implementation of the harmonised colours may well have been decided years before (and quite possibly years before Part P had even been thought of), but when Part P came along, it's not impossible that the 'harmonisation date' was one of the factors taken into consideration in deciding when Part P was to be implemented!
 
It was nothing to do with Part P.
Exactly, but some people have tried to include it and some people have suggested they occurred at the same time thereby .
Indeed our local building inspector said he would use the colours of evidence of Part P or not.

Indeed I have heard more than one person claiming that "Part P came about because of the death of a Minister`s Daughter". Bolder Dash.
 
Exactly, but some people have tried to include it and some people have suggested they occurred at the same time thereby .
Indeed our local building inspector said he would use the colours of evidence of Part P or not.
Probably the same inspector who won't sign off SUNRAY's work until he does something that isn't required.
 
It has to be 80s, well I think so anyway...

70s would be rewireable

90s would be split load

Ish...
I was still installing rewirable Wylex boards well into the 90's. We moved into the house I'm in now in lat 1994 and it was several years later I changed one of these
1763050686414.jpeg

To an 8way version of these
1763050906749.jpeg
with a plastic back.
 
Probably the same inspector who won't sign off SUNRAY's work until he does something that isn't required.
If you're referring to the crazy earth bonding situation it was far from only me affected.:(
 
I was still installing rewirable Wylex boards well into the 90's.

Most of the Wylex rewirable carriers were getting swapped for push button MCBs, and then toggle MCBs in the 80s.

It's surprising if rewireables were getting installed in the 90s.
 

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Back
Top