Angela Rayner

[Notch7]

The investigation can go back four years

thank you for admitting I am correct

it is noted gas112 has never criticised the govt for spaffing £4b up the wall on bogus PPE contracts

the stench of gas112s hypocrisy is overwhelming

 

[carmanmemoranda]

tax investiggation time limits
The investigation can go back four years, although this is extended to six years where careless mistakes have been made, and 20 years if there is any indication of dishonesty.

by repeatedly denying it and putting wrong address that is dishonesty you know where you live

If you know this, why do you try to misrepresent it

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Let's face it the lefties will defend her, even if it turns out that her tax evasion was deliberate. Poor value emergency supply contracts maybe s***, but so far nothing illegal has emerged.

If you are going to be a loudmouth on other people's tax, you better make sure you understand the rules that apply to your own dealings.

Who is defending her?

Showing there are much worse cases isn't defence. Its showing hypocrisy

 

[noseall]

If only the government had handy tools to walk you through the calculations step by step…. Oh wait they do.

Angela sold her house and became an MP within 60 days. She still had time to get her affairs in order.

The fact is she is just a loud mouth gobsh** not very bright and probably thought she’d get away with it. Just the right kinda gal to be deputy PM.

She’s 2 jags in a skirt, but less bright.

Wow, the woman hatred is strong with this one.
I can envisage an apoplectic gammon, complete with steam coming out of his ears, if she ever gets to decide on the wealthy paying more tax.
Good ole Angela.

 

[gas112]

thank you for admitting I am correct

it is noted gas112 has never criticised the govt for spaffing £4b up the wall on bogus PPE contracts

the stench of gas112s hypocrisy is overwhelming

i know you struggle with reading and your ruler doesnt stretch as far across as the 20 years. Lets see what now happens after the current investigation

 

[gas112]

If you know this, why do you try to misrepresent it

do you know where you live or does the mrs tie a wee tag to you like paddington bear in case you get lost

 

[carmanmemoranda]

do you know where you live or does the mrs tie a wee tag to you like paddington bear in case you get lost

That's a swerve.

Was the question too difficult?

 

[gas112]

That's a swerve.

Was the question too difficult?

no swerve at all is it dishonest to lie where you live for tax purposes yes or no

 

[carmanmemoranda]

no swerve at all is it dishonest to lie where you live for tax purposes yes or no

Another separate question, equals another swerve.

To remind you, your comment was about the number of years hmrc could investigate, not my address

 

[gas112]

Another separate question, equals another swerve.

To remind you, your comment was about the number of years hmrc could investigate, not my address

yes and my comment was correct it is not out of time frame as there is an indication of dishonesty and they can go back 20 years what bit of that are you struggling with

 

[Notch7]

Let's face it the lefties will defend her, even if it turns out that her tax evasion was deliberate. Poor value emergency supply contracts maybe s***, but so far nothing illegal has emerged.

If you are going to be a loudmouth on other people's tax, you better make sure you understand the rules that apply to your own dealings.

I haven’t defended her, if she is found to have been dishonest she deserves to be fined.

Poor value emergency supply contracts maybe s***, but so far nothing illegal has emerged

Motorbiking says:

£4b of taxpayers money spaffed up the wall, MBK say “bah it was just “poor value”

Labour MP might have done something wrong and could owe max £3,500 MBK says: “oh god it’s absolutely horrendous, I need to post pages and pages about it, it’s that bad.

Conservative voters: extreme hypocrites.
They have no shame

 

[carmanmemoranda]

yes and my comment was correct it is not out of time frame as there is an indication of dishonesty and they can go back 20 years what bit of that are you struggling with

How you misrepresented it.

I'm not struggling, it's you that's swerving

 

[Notch7]

as there is an indication of dishonesty

Opinion stated as fact.

 

[gas112]

Opinion stated as fact.

what are you saying she is that thick she didnt know where she was living and you want her to help run the country.
And is that not what an investigation will determine whether its fact or not .

 

[gas112]

How you misrepresented it.

I'm not struggling, it's you that's swerving

you clearly are struggling as per usual