Yet here they are poised to use force against a Danish territory.
At last leaders with balls...
- Thread starter ellal
- Start date
Not exactly poised. In any case, key word, Danish. Not British. They don’t have the 'special relationship' that we do - as long as Starmer keeps quiet and continues licking arse.
Anyway, back on El Topico.
www.thedailymash.co.uk
BRITAIN’S courageous fighting forces are eager to step in and defend Ukraine once the war is over and any threat of violence is gone.
A landmark agreement between the UK and France will see Britain’s famously valiant forces deployed in Ukraine once they have 100 per cent certainty that they will not be shot at by Russians.
An Army spokesperson said: “Our boys are raring to go. All they’re waiting for is a peace treaty to be inked and they’ll swoop right in, ready for anything peaceful and reasonably pleasant.
“The second the last tank rolls out of the Donbas region they’ll be there to show Putin who’s boss. Actually, maybe once the rubble’s been bulldozed and the territory’s been swept for mines. We don’t want any nasty injuries.
“Either way, it’ll be this generation’s D-Day. Plucky old Britain to Europe’s rescue in the face of overwhelming adversity once again. But instead of the Nazi war machine, this time we’ll be facing demilitarised zones.
“Even as we speak our crack forces are busy training. The ranks are building their collections of porn DVDs, and officers are lazily leaning back on chairs in mess halls while scrolling phones. Yes, Ukraine is in safe hands.”
Soldier Martin Bishop said: “We’ve been given orders to retreat if one of us gets so much as a paper cut. No need to drag NATO into this.”
Heroic UK troops ready to defend Ukraine once war's over
BRITAIN’S courageous fighting forces are eager to step in and defend Ukraine once the war is over and any threat of violence is gone.
www.thedailymash.co.uk
BRITAIN’S courageous fighting forces are eager to step in and defend Ukraine once the war is over and any threat of violence is gone.
A landmark agreement between the UK and France will see Britain’s famously valiant forces deployed in Ukraine once they have 100 per cent certainty that they will not be shot at by Russians.
An Army spokesperson said: “Our boys are raring to go. All they’re waiting for is a peace treaty to be inked and they’ll swoop right in, ready for anything peaceful and reasonably pleasant.
“The second the last tank rolls out of the Donbas region they’ll be there to show Putin who’s boss. Actually, maybe once the rubble’s been bulldozed and the territory’s been swept for mines. We don’t want any nasty injuries.
“Either way, it’ll be this generation’s D-Day. Plucky old Britain to Europe’s rescue in the face of overwhelming adversity once again. But instead of the Nazi war machine, this time we’ll be facing demilitarised zones.
“Even as we speak our crack forces are busy training. The ranks are building their collections of porn DVDs, and officers are lazily leaning back on chairs in mess halls while scrolling phones. Yes, Ukraine is in safe hands.”
Soldier Martin Bishop said: “We’ve been given orders to retreat if one of us gets so much as a paper cut. No need to drag NATO into this.”
I suppose once the fat orange nonce has Greenland, there's nothing stopping him getting his grubby little hands on anything else valuable to him, over here in Europe.
Let's not forget, he only has a limited amount of time to wreck the globe in favour of US billionaires.
If you’re talking about the fact that US presidents can only serve two terms, it wouldn’t surprise me to see him to try to change that too.
He's nutty enough to attempt it.
You obviously do not recall that it was mainly Bill Clinton's foot-dragging over Bosnia that hampered progress. The then Conservative UK government waffled and prevaricated endlessly, but no sensible Brit was under any delusion about the UK role: it was the US that really mattered. You may not like to hear it, but it was the election of Tony Blair and New Labour in 1997 that galvanised action on that front. Working at NATO at the time, I remember it well.
So diplomacy according to you depends on arse licking...
I guess that's why your politics are based on a party/political ideology that sucks up to poo tin!
Starmer has got to do what he is best at……
With regards to Trump - yes. You'd be a fool not to shine his shoes. It sounds shallow, but that is the person you are dealing with. Most savvy world leaders play him like a fiddle.
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 18,816
- Reaction score
- 1,604
- Country
Have you thought about the implications for nato, and therefore us?
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 14,234
- Reaction score
- 8,437
- Country
Nobody is going to go against the USA especially NATO
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,209
- Reaction score
- 5,547
- Country
NATO is nothing without the US.
I can’t see NATO being put at risk for Greenland.
I can’t see NATO being put at risk for Greenland.
- Joined
- 17 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 172
- Reaction score
- 37
- Country
I learnt to stop worrying and love the bomb
You know what probably means I take it.
