Do you think that is good, to be de selected, by voting for what you belive and support?
Is that not forcing an MP to NOT represent his constituency ? Surely the MP is there to represent his constituency to Government and not to force Government policy onto them?
Doesn't matter if you agree with your MP's view, but surely he MUST act in what he believes is correct, without fear or favour ?
No, not at all.
It is an MP's duty to look after his consituency interests, all of them. He must act on their behalf. Even if you don't agree with the MP, you must have faith that he will act in a RESPONSIBLE way.
It is a TOTAL LOSS OF DEMOCRACY to force an MP to vote in any specific way. Forcing the Governments view onto his constituents is morally, and possibly legally, wrong.
Doesn't matter whether you support leave or remain, any MP should vote by his beliefs. That is what is he elected to do!
No, not at all.
It is an MP's duty to look after his consituency interests, all of them. He must act on their behalf. Even if you don't agree with the MP, you must have faith that he will act in a RESPONSIBLE way.
It is a TOTAL LOSS OF DEMOCRACY to force an MP to vote in any specific way. Forcing the Governments view onto his constituents is morally, and possibly legally, wrong.
Doesn't matter whether you support leave or remain, any MP should vote by his beliefs. That is what is he elected to do!
Someone still doesn't understand the concept of a 'parliamentary democracy'They are there to serve the public. They are not there to give the public what they think is best.
As you’ve kindly jumped in here perhaps you can answer my question above.Someone still doesn't understand the concept of a 'parliamentary democracy'
FFS, that's what you wanted when you apparently knew exactly what you were voting for!
In that case, it was the duty of the MP's to carry out the wishes of the majority of the electorate. They are there to serve the public. They are not there to give the public what they think is best
That doesn’t answer my question re your statement that MP's must be free to vote as they think fit. The whip system contradicts this. It seems every remainer is having a scream because Boris has threatened them with expulsion if they go against his policy. What’s the difference between that and the whip system.Ignore the 1 specific vote. Brexit.
And re answer ?
The referendum, which should never have been held without true and full information of both sides being made available, gave a broad outline. It is up to the Government to decide what and how to do that. Which means every MP acting on the best interests of his consituents.
This is not a brexit/leaver argument. It is a democracy argument.
Indeed it should be left to the government to decide and not a house full of anti brexit and opposition parties to join forces to topple the government and stop Brexit win win. Theres many mps there acting against the will of their constituents.Ignore the 1 specific vote. Brexit.
And re answer ?
The referendum, which should never have been held without true and full information of both sides being made available, gave a broad outline. It is up to the Government to decide what and how to do that. Which means every MP acting on the best interests of his consituents.
This is not a brexit/leaver argument. It is a democracy argument.
What I've failed to respect all along is the low down spineless cvnts
I haven't 'jumped in', as anyone is allowed to comment...As you’ve kindly jumped in here perhaps you can answer my question above.