Now that both cases brought by the Yewtree investigation have failed when properly tried by jury, is it not time to test the evidence against Jimmy Saville in the same way. After all, he cannot defend himself.
I assume the police will be taking action against the claimants now? For wasting police time and public money and perjury.
Are you accusing father abraham of smurfie fiddling?I held off posting this during the trial, this is one of the incidents from TOTP it's from around 13:00 into the video.
I assume the police will be taking action against the claimants now? For wasting police time and public money and perjury.
Are you accusing father abraham of smurfie fiddling?
this is one of the incidents from TOTP it's from around 13:00 into the video.
I understand that, although found not guilty, DLT has been obliged to sell his house (admittedly a vast mansion) to pay for his defence. So he has, in effect, been punished for something he has now been found not to have done.
His accusers, although having gained nothing, have lost nothing.
So who are the real winners (apart from the lawyers, of course) and losers here?
It seems to me that, if you want to accuse someone of something, do so. You have nothing to lose.