Dont be abusive on facebook or this Forum!

Joined
26 Jun 2004
Messages
64,635
Reaction score
4,782
Location
London
Country
United Kingdom
Joseph Griffin, 43, of Hartlepool, County Durham, faced court this week for a Facebook post that called another man a paedophile. He pleaded guilty and was fined for sending the offensive message - which he said he did out of anger and frustration.

It underlines the importance of serious thought before taking to the social networks.


The case
Griffin updated his status to include the claim about another man - which also included his name and address. The message was up for 90 minutes in the middle of August before he deleted it.

The prosecuting lawyer said: "Mr Griffin told police that he had a Facebook account and admitted he had put comments on about this man because he was angry and frustrated."

Your rights
•How to complain
•How to make a compensation claim
•Five insurance myths - blown out of the water!
Crime
•Changes to criminal compensation
•Fraud at record level: the risks
•Hugger muggers: the cuddly criminals


Griffin pleaded guilty to sending by public communication network an offensive, indecent, obscene, or menacing message or matter. He was fined £50, ordered to pay £85 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.


The risks
It's the latest in a long line of cases which highlight the dangers of posting your views on social networking sites without understanding the risks you are taking.

We have seen a number of court cases of individuals being forced to face the music for something they have written on Facebook and Twitter. A famous case in 2011 between two Welsh town councillors was settled with £3,000 compensation.

There have also been those jailed for malicious tweets, including 21-year old Liam Stacey - imprisoned for his Tweets about footballer Fabrice Muamba.


The law
The law is very clear. Any social media update which would lower the average person's view of someone, or make them feel threatened or distressed, is punishable by law. And increasingly, these cases are coming to court.


Richard Moorhead, Professor of Law and Professional Ethics at UCL, and Director of the Centre for Ethics and Law told AOL: "The courts are starting to grapple with social media. They are seeing it as an emerging problem and are giving every signal that they are taking it very seriously."

He warns: "People need to be careful that what they say is truthful and fair. They should follow basic rules of common sense. If you're honest and not rude about other people then you're not generally going to be in any trouble. It's easy for people to get carried away, but they need to take time to calm down before they post anything online."

The advice is therefore to think very carefully before you post. Is your post offensive, could it upset someone or open them to ridicule? And if in doubt err on the side of caution. If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all.
 
Sponsored Links
just don't use facebook or twitter then, both irrelvant wastes of time, effort, energy and electrons in the main.
 
Sponsored Links
Sadbook and twit are great if you want a blow by blow account of another persons' day i.e. when they have had a wee, a cup of tea, brushed their hair etc.

I, like Eddie M can live without such info'.
 
Whilst I don't use facebook, I am at least aware there is more to it than "Noseall farted at 11am, and had a cup of tea".

There are various social groups you can join, kind of like mini forums, I know people that use them for work purposes (though linked-in is a bit more popular for that reason).




As to the OP, these layers and judges are scum, this is nothing more than thought crime, sticks and stones etc.
 
Twitter can be good as you can get all sorts of interesting feeds.

Calling somebody a pedophile is incredibly damaging. he is right to go to court. No freedom of speech in the UK.
 
I wonder how long it will be before someone has their face-book account hacked, and ends up in court because of what "they" said.
 
Im sure if that happened and you removed the damaging posts then you'd have little to worry about. But you have to be careful what you say on these sites. You can defame an anonymous poster if somebody else knows who he is
 
Yes some people can be abused with impunity.

eg

People who don't believe in evolution
People who think it's hurtful to call Liverpool 'Self Pity City'
People who used to live in a cave
Tweedledum and Tweedledee
Anybody who thinks gravity is instantaneous
People who think conveyor belts can stop an aircraft taking off

And people who fall into more than one can really be teased, at every possible opportunity in fact, except they are so dumb that it isn't really all that fun.
 
The internet is the wild west and should remain that way.
Thin skinned facetwits should stay clear of the diynot gd saloon. :LOL: :mrgreen:
 
Twitter can be good as you can get all sorts of interesting feeds.

Calling somebody a pedophile is incredibly damaging. he is right to go to court. No freedom of speech in the UK.

Of course there is freedom of speech in the UK. If your Muslim and choose to call our brave soldiers "Scum", "Babykillers." and " Terrorists." , your quite welcome to. You can hold up posters telling us that "Islam will Dominate the West" and "Death to all Infidels", with total impunity......


However,,, If your an indigenous Brit, you can't hold up a poster saying "Death to all non Christians. " or "Christianity will Dominate the East". You dare not say " Middle Eastern terrorists are the scum of the earth."


But.... if you know a paedophile, your quite entitled to call him/her a paedophile (just as long as it's actually true). ;) ;) ;) ;)
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top