Indonesia has executed eight drug smugglers .... pity we never had the same idea..... cant see any sympathy for them
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-32501712
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-32501712
Drug smugglers executed
- Thread starter Bodgeitandleggit
- Start date
Sponsored Links
If this bit is true it's quite incredible given whats going to happen to him. 
I'll give it a whirl, and report back with my findings.
Sponsored Links
Nothing like the miserable slow deaths they dish out.
There are many other factors that lead to almost instant loss of consciousnesses and death.The concussive impact of the bullets and massive blood pressure drop for starters. I'd say it was relatively humane, provided they can shoot straight. There are worse ways to die.
The 'war on drugs' kills more people than it saves.
Cheer on the bloodshed, its mostly poor people that die, and what is their life worth compared to a feeling of moral superiority.
Cheer on the bloodshed, its mostly poor people that die, and what is their life worth compared to a feeling of moral superiority.
I doubt that collateral damage is at the forefront of either the executioners or the victims thoughts.
- Joined
- 11 Jan 2004
- Messages
- 42,707
- Reaction score
- 2,629
- Country
This is very interesting.
I wonder which method of execution is the most 'pleasant'.
Hanging - the proper way, by snapping the neck.
Hanging - the nasty way, by strangulation.
Firing squad - by shooting through the heart.
Being shot through the head - assuming the bullet passes through the mid-brain.
Decapitation - such as the French guillotine or the axe/sword (not the barbaric way of ISIS - sawing through the neck).
Overdose of anaesthetic - as is customarily done to animals.
Bleeding to death - severing the vessels of the neck (but not the much slower favourite of suicides, slitting the wrists).
These are in no particular order, just as they occurred to me, and I'm sure that I have missed some which others will point out!
I have my own ideas of which I think would be the quickest and least unpleasant death, which I'd suggest is the speed of onset of unconsciousness rather than brain death, but I'd be interested to hear what others think.
I wonder which method of execution is the most 'pleasant'.
Hanging - the proper way, by snapping the neck.
Hanging - the nasty way, by strangulation.
Firing squad - by shooting through the heart.
Being shot through the head - assuming the bullet passes through the mid-brain.
Decapitation - such as the French guillotine or the axe/sword (not the barbaric way of ISIS - sawing through the neck).
Overdose of anaesthetic - as is customarily done to animals.
Bleeding to death - severing the vessels of the neck (but not the much slower favourite of suicides, slitting the wrists).
These are in no particular order, just as they occurred to me, and I'm sure that I have missed some which others will point out!
I have my own ideas of which I think would be the quickest and least unpleasant death, which I'd suggest is the speed of onset of unconsciousness rather than brain death, but I'd be interested to hear what others think.
As long as you are unconscious at the point of death what is the difference?
Three high velocity bullets at the chest from close range are not going to leave the victim lucid and chatty afterwards. With a ruined heart, severe trauma to the surrounding blood vessels, hydrostatic shock to just about everywhere else, these people will not be aware of anything after those bullets strike.
Three high velocity bullets at the chest from close range are not going to leave the victim lucid and chatty afterwards. With a ruined heart, severe trauma to the surrounding blood vessels, hydrostatic shock to just about everywhere else, these people will not be aware of anything after those bullets strike.
Sponsored Links
