Electric boiler?

[JohnW2]

Does anyone know about the relative cost of gas and electricity in Germany (or, come to that, the rest of mainland Europe)?

Fischer appear to be a large, 'serious' and fairly reputable company, so if they are finding significant markets, they presumably must be in countries where the gas/electricity price comparison is very different from what it is in the UK? Mind you, their marketing people seem to be a bit lacking, since they surely must know about UK prices and I doubt that a significant number of even half-informed or half-advised people in UK would go with the all-electric option, so I wonder why they're bothering to try to sell in UK?

 

[ericmark]

so we are then presumably simply back to the relative cost of the fuesl?

No, this is my point, fill a bath, and looking at fuel cost, but if you need 1 pint of hot water, and to get it you need to run off 4 pints first, add the inefficiency of the boiler, and your gas or oil needs to be 1/6 of the price of electric.

The idea to store energy has been considered, this is super expensive due to the heat stores needing to be up-stairs for safety with solid fuel, so the fire can cool with thermo syphon, but without solid fuel the tanks could be on the ground floor, but unless some energy storage, electric heating is just not going to work.

 

[JohnW2]

No, this is my point, fill a bath, and looking at fuel cost, but if you need 1 pint of hot water, and to get it you need to run off 4 pints first ...

Even that can presumably be largely addressed.

In my youngest years (and maybe the same for you), the only source of hot water we had was a gas-powered 'Ascot' instantaneous heater, with a 'swing arm' just a few inches from basin and bath. I honestly can't remember what happened in the kitchen - maybe there was another such heater?

 

[Harry Bloomfield]

Indeed, but as I've just written, it's a long-term situations, so that the fact that "this is the most expensive time of the year for electricity" is seemingly irrelevant.

Not really, because winter is the time when heat is required.

 

[JohnW2]

Not really, because winter is the time when heat is required.

It is, but for a system which is going to be used for the next several years, what has the fact that "now is Winter" (hence "the most expensive time of year for electricity") got to do with anything?

 

[Harry Bloomfield]

Mind you, their marketing people seem to be a bit lacking, since they surely must know about UK prices and I doubt that a significant number of even half-informed or half-advised people in UK would go with the all-electric option, so I wonder why they're bothering to try to sell in UK?

Because some people are daft enough, to believe the hype? Often, they are installed in HMO's, where the tenant pay the energy costs.

 

[Harry Bloomfield]

It is, but for a system which is going to be used for the next several years, what has the fact that "now is Winter" (hence "the most expensive time of year for electricity") got to do with anything?

Did you not understand 'My own cost varies, with each day, dependent on demand, wind, and solar.' In winter, the cost rises dramatically, in winter, is also when there is a large demand.

 

[ericmark]

Even that can presumably be largely addressed.

In my youngest years (and maybe the same for you), the only source of hot water we had was a gas-powered 'Ascot' instantaneous heater, with a 'swing arm' just a few inches from basin and bath. I honestly can't remember what happened in the kitchen - maybe there was another such heater?

Yes, I remember them, can you get an oil fired version? I suppose there is a calor gas version? I have upper bathroom, lower bathroom, front kitchen, back kitchen, and shower room, so it would need 5 units, so for me non-starter. The loses boiler to cylinder are however therefore on all outlets, so it is that lose I think about.

 

[flameport]

Fischer products

are grossly overpriced and make no sense for anyone ever.

electric combi or an electric heating-only boiler

makes no sense for anyone ever.

is there ever a situation in which it would make sense to even consider an all-electric approach to space/water heating?

There are, but there are far more situations where it doesn't.

In any event, electric hot water should be a storage system, such as an immersion heater in a hot water cylinder.
Any attempts to provide instant hot water via electricity in a normal dwelling will fail.
Electric combis are the equivalent of filling a bath with an electric shower, and far worse than that if you want actual hot water for kitchen purposes.
An electric boiler to heat radiators just adds massive cost and complexity, the same end result is obtained with wall mounted panel heaters.

Heat pumps are useful in some situations, mainly those where the entire system is being replaced anyway. Pricing currently is massively inflated due to the government grant distorting the market and encouraging bandwagon companies to supply the demand.
They are also usually set up for heating the property all the time even with radiators, and with UFH that's pretty much the only option, which is not particularly useful for people who go out during the day.

For smaller properties with decent insulation, the large upfront costs of a heat pump and installation may not make sense, as a small number of electric panel heaters would be vastly cheaper to install even if the running costs were higher.

The overlooked heat pump option is what has previously been sold as air conditioning - an outdoor unit with 4 or more indoor units, which can provide instant heating or cooling when required, far more suitable for properties which are unoccupied for large parts of the day or night. They are a fraction of the cost to install compared to wet heat pumps used with radiators or UFH.

 

[flameport]

. I honestly can't remember what happened in the kitchen - maybe there was another such heater?

It was a pipe from the bathroom heater, so when the kitchen tap was used the bathroom heater turned on automatically, and when the open flue was blocked with a birds nest it billowed toxic fumes into the upstairs of the house without anyone realising until it was too late.

 

[plugwash]

The overlooked heat pump option is what has previously been sold as air conditioning - an outdoor unit with 4 or more indoor units, which can provide instant heating or cooling when required, far more suitable for properties which are unoccupied for large parts of the day or night. They are a fraction of the cost to install compared to wet heat pumps used with radiators or UFH.

The problem is the green lobby have convinced the government that the heat pump grants and planning exemptions should only apply to heat-only systems.

I think this is very short-sighted, but it's the reality we currently have to deal with

 

[JohnW2]

Did you not understand 'My own cost varies, with each day, dependent on demand, wind, and solar.' In winter, the cost rises dramatically, in winter, is also when there is a large demand.

Yes, of course I understood the first time you wrote it - and do again now that you have repeated it.

What I did not (and still do not) understand is why it's relevant that it is currently Winter. It could just as easily have been mid-Summer when I posted my message and my point would have been exactly the same - although I doubt that Why Not Indeed would then have written "...this is the least expensive time of the year for electricity ...", even if that had been true.

Don't forget that your involvement in this exchange started when you responded to my response to Why Not Indeed having written "... this is the most expensive time of the year for electricity ..."