It's looking alot better, but I've got a little niggle with the details of the main trusses.
Firstly, as this is an evolved design, we're kind of missing a major point. A standard trussed roof will either be similar trussed rafters all along, or trusses at regular spacing and smaller rafters in between, i.e. the trusses are made of bigger stuff than the common rafters. This either means your truss members are too small, or the common rafters are too big. It's too much technical thinking to try to work out which is which at this time of night.
Secondly, the detail at the top of the 'kingposts' on the main trusses. The kingpost won't actually be doing anything from a structural point of view, as the loads will all be taken by the rafters and the tie. The way it looks though, it'll be difficult to make a connection between the top of the rafters and the ridge, so the kingpost will be trying to take the load. This will mean the point load from the ridge will be sitting on the tie member which isn't designed to span from eaves to eaves with this kind of load. I'd do away with the king post and actually make these trusses as whole frames, notching the ridge beam where it passes over them. Either that or the truss will be ineffective and the ridge will try to span the whole nine (well six) yards.
Firstly, as this is an evolved design, we're kind of missing a major point. A standard trussed roof will either be similar trussed rafters all along, or trusses at regular spacing and smaller rafters in between, i.e. the trusses are made of bigger stuff than the common rafters. This either means your truss members are too small, or the common rafters are too big. It's too much technical thinking to try to work out which is which at this time of night.
Secondly, the detail at the top of the 'kingposts' on the main trusses. The kingpost won't actually be doing anything from a structural point of view, as the loads will all be taken by the rafters and the tie. The way it looks though, it'll be difficult to make a connection between the top of the rafters and the ridge, so the kingpost will be trying to take the load. This will mean the point load from the ridge will be sitting on the tie member which isn't designed to span from eaves to eaves with this kind of load. I'd do away with the king post and actually make these trusses as whole frames, notching the ridge beam where it passes over them. Either that or the truss will be ineffective and the ridge will try to span the whole nine (well six) yards.
