For those that think vaccines are safe !!!!

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/BenefitsTaxCreditsAndOtherSupport/Disabledpeople/DG_10018714

gotta weigh it up there are risks involved.
As with all things, there are risks either way you decide.

Good doctors and bad. Unfortunately we only get to know about things/people when it all goes wrong. Sadly, with people, this can be tragic.

however, for every treatment that goes wrong, how many were successful?
 
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/BenefitsTaxCreditsAndOtherSupport/Disabledpeople/DG_10018714

gotta weigh it up there are risks involved.
As with all things, there are risks either way you decide.

Good doctors and bad. Unfortunately we only get to know about things/people when it all goes wrong. Sadly, with people, this can be tragic.

however, for every treatment that goes wrong, how many were successful?

Try and explain that to the parent of a dead child who was strongly advised by the state , schools and medical profession to have a vaccination done with the message that it was perfectly safe.. I held back and was glad I did as now my daughter will get the better of the two vaccines instead of the cheapest.
 
As with all things, there are risks either way you decide.

Thats what Gasbani has done but noone seems to allow him that privilege , everyone instead wants to tell him he is wrong.
 
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/BenefitsTaxCreditsAndOtherSupport/Disabledpeople/DG_10018714

gotta weigh it up there are risks involved.
As with all things, there are risks either way you decide.

Good doctors and bad. Unfortunately we only get to know about things/people when it all goes wrong. Sadly, with people, this can be tragic.

however, for every treatment that goes wrong, how many were successful?

Try and explain that to the parent of a dead child who was strongly advised by the state , schools and medical profession to have a vaccination done with the message that it was perfectly safe.. I held back and was glad I did as now my daughter will get the better of the two vaccines instead of the cheapest.

Seems clear thought eludes you Dr Yaleguy.
On your argument only your judgement appears to be trustworthy.

And are you still banging on about your unhealthy obsession of under age sex or referring ot MMR?
 
The population is overwhelmingly far safer with a vaccination program than without. Nothing is 100% guaranteed when it comes to health though.
 
2.2 Million Adverse Drug Reactions Kill 106,000 Annually!
Posted on October 11, 2011 by Clark Hansen, N.M.D.

These numbers are certainly higher now. This study was first published in April 1998 — Data obtained from U.S. hospital records showed that 2,216,000 hospitalized patients had serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) and 106,000 died every year, making these ADRs the fourth leading cause of death.

To estimate the incidence of serious and fatal adverse drug reactions (ADR) in U.S. hospital patients, four electronic databases were searched from 1966 to 1996. The researchers excluded errors in drug administration, noncompliance, overdose, drug abuse, therapeutic failures, and possible ADRs. Serious ADRs were defined as those that required hospitalization, were permanently disabling, or resulted in death.

These 2.2 million ADRs and 106,000 fatalities were all determined to be due to known side effects of the drugs. The researchers who analyzed the data from U.S. hospital records were careful to exclude errors in giving the wrong drug, cases of drug overdose, drug abuse, not taking the right drug, therapeutic failures, and possible ADRs.

These astounding numbers of ADRs and fatalities were all confirmed, which leads us to assume that there was an even larger number of suspected ADR’s that could not be confirmed and thus were not reported.

Consumers must ask their doctors about drug side effects. The FDA should require mandatory dispensing of complete drug information in terms the lay public can understand and require WARNING LABELS on all drugs that have been associated with serious or fatal ADRs.

The current FDA requirement that drug companies publish the pharmaceutical / physician drug information with any advertised drug is Latin to everyone else. It appears that the pharmaceutical companies do it intentionally to prevent the public from discovering the real truth about the lack of known actions of the drugs as well as their side effects. The data is there; it’s just buried in thousands of words of medical jargon that’s too technical and too tiny for any one to read but a scientist with very thick glasses or a microscope.

SOURCE: JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) 1998 Apr 15;279(15):1200-1205
 
Fags kill that many in the UK alone each year.
 
The companies protect themslelves with a very wide ranging disclaimer.
Just look at the side effects noted for something as simple as a daily tablet to reduce blood pressure. . .
http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Diabet...on=Heart failure and oedema&medicine=ramipril

It looks like the NHS had brought Cervirax in as a new black triangle drug but with no education of health professionals on the recognising and reporting of adverse incidents.

http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/HPV-vaccination/Pages/Side-effects.aspx
 
For all you naysayer's

Treatment for illness - be it remedy or prevention, is not compulsory.

You can of course leave yourself open to the whims of mother nature.
 
2.2 Million Adverse Drug Reactions Kill 106,000 Annually!

Which drugs and under what conditions.

Are we talking serious medical drugs given to those in intensive care, or just simple jabs.

Somehow I doubt many of those 106,000 fall into the latter category.
 
Back
Top