Henry Nowak inquest...

If the attacker had been a white man, and Henry black, do you think the outcome would have been the same? I don't.
We'll ever know, but the police have been pretty complacent when comes to black people in the past. I reckon if the attacker had been white and the victim black then there'd be as much outrage as there is now, except different people would be outraged and no one would be calling for white people to be deported.
 
He wasn't. He was following the police's rules and training to the letter.

Racist allegations are an extreme priority in comparison to pretty much everything.

He was doing as he was taught and is required to do.

They're institutionally woke.
It's weird how a report has concluded that police force are institutionally racist against non-white people.

The body cam footage clearly shows he didn't give a crap. I'm sure the police rules don't say, "be lazy and ignorant", or "dismiss white people lying on the ground".

You've been gas-lit again.
 
There is a feeling amongst many that the pendulum has swung too far. Whether that is backed up by the data is another matter.
It's misleading to state that there's a pendulum. This implies that we must take side with either native or non-native people. Those criticising the police now definitely don't want a return to the old days of "I'm arresting you on suspicion of being black".

The police should not be taking sides with or against anyone. They should only look at the facts.

They had an allegation of racism from one party. They believed it completely, without any evidence.

They also had an allegation of a stabbing from the other party. They dismissed this, without investigating.

The copper was undoubtedly extremely incompetent. But his judgement was likely swayed by the DEI training telling them that racism is of supreme importance. He panicked, and unquestioningly backed the racial minority party, which was the result of the racist DEI training he would have been indoctrinated with.
 
So do you think that two wrongs make a right? Or do you think that the only options are different varieties of prejudice?
You've got that all wrong...

I was merely pointing out the hypocrisy of some ;)

And here's some more hypocrisy...

A lot of those same people, who seem to hold RW views, want the UK to withdraw from the HRA...

Mainly it seems because they believe it only applies to/favours immigrants...

Well some details about this inquest...

"A full inquest into the death of the student is due to open at Winchester Coroner's Court with a jury on 20 September 2027.
It will look at whether any "act or omission by a police officer" caused or contributed to his death"

"Hampshire coroner Jason Pegg said at the inquest opening that while the crown court trial and conviction of Nowak's killer, Digwa, had largely established "how" the teenager died, he needed to be satisfied there was "sufficient reason" to explore his death further"

"He decided there was."

And one of the reasons he came to that decision?

"He concluded the "right to life" legal obligations in Article 2 of the Human Rights Act had been triggered in this case"

Legal obligations that would not be there if the RW get their way!
 
the DEI training telling them that racism is of supreme importance ..,.. the racist DEI training
Where is this material that you claimed to have seen, and I've asked you to post it here.
It's not top secret, if you've seen it, post if for us to see also.
 
What Report, the one in Ivor's imagination?
You keep denying the existence of everything that anyone else doesn't wave in front of you.

You could find out things for yourself instead of demanding that everyone else brings things to you, which they won't.

You can't just pretend things don't exist just because you're ignorant of them.
 
You keep denying the existence of everything that anyone else doesn't wave in front of you.
Because you keep stating your opinion about things which you claim to have seen. But you won't post it because you're lying about having seen it. :rolleyes:
You could find out things for yourself
I have
instead of demanding that everyone else brings things to you, which they won't.
But I want to be sure we are discussing the same thing. If we're not we'd be talking at cross purposes. :rolleyes:

You can't just pretend things don't exist just because you're ignorant of them.
You can't just pretend things do exist and hope others are ignorant of them. :rolleyes:

Post it, or admit you were telling lies. :rolleyes:
 
Because you keep stating your opinion about things which you claim to have seen. But you won't post it because you're lying about having seen it. :rolleyes:
I've known several people who regularly make random accusations that others are liars.

They all have one thing in common, they all talk completely fabricated rubbish and live in a fantasy world in their own head.

Takes one to know one, as they say.
 
I've known several people who regularly make random accusations that others are liars.

They all have one thing in common, they all talk completely fabricated rubbish and live in a fantasy world in their own head.

Takes one to know one, as they say.
So post this DEI training material you claim to have seen, to prove you weren't lying. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top