[I asked a few civil and relevant questions because of the possibility that the OP had not considered them. If everybody here always makes the assumption that people asking questions have always considered every aspect and implication of what they want to do, and never checks, then I can guarantee you that they won't always provide effective advice.
Do you really believe that everybody who comes here for advice has already thought about everything related to what they want to do?
Most people do not think out of the box. They look only at the obvious and required aim of the project and do not seek out the dis-advantages or problems that might show the project to be non viable.
So I fully agree with Ban All Sheds on the need to develop the question to cover the points the original question has not covered before a complete package of advice can be provided for the specific application.
But I cannot agree with his way of developing the question which is seen as being agressive ( though I assume it is not meant to be agressive ).