Yes that's a long span; 356 seems about right.Its 356mm. The span is quite long at 8m. I was a bit shocked when i saw them craning it off tbh, but that is what was specified.
Yes that's a long span; 356 seems about right.Its 356mm. The span is quite long at 8m. I was a bit shocked when i saw them craning it off tbh, but that is what was specified.
Are you that imaginative? I thought you followed convention.Looks like the sort of sh1t I’d do. So on that note I’d get it changed for brick.
My most imaginative ideas I felt compelled to keep off the forum. You professionals simply aren’t ready for my advanced techniques. You’d all simply mock. Give it a few years and all your walls will be soaked bread and Cheerios.Are you that imaginative? I thought you followed convention.
Each one of those timbers could shrink across the grain by as much as say 3mm. It could mean then, that the steel settles onto something it shouldn't or it could have no consequences whatsoever. Vertical (grain) timber propping would have made more sense.Given that wood expands and contracts, that steel would be going up and down like a yo yo
It's also about three times stronger parallel to the grain than it is perpendicular to the grain (as it is in the pic).Vertical (grain) timber propping would have made more sense.
must be a noseall jobIs the grey thing really a steel beam?? If so,it's a whopper.
Nowt.What would happen if roof leaked and those timbers got soaked?
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local