Credability
I will
Concede that the Catholic Church has been abusing woman gild and children for 2000 years
Your Islam has only been doing it for 800 years
so they have some catching upTo do
- Status
Credability
I will
Concede that the Catholic Church has been abusing woman gild and children for 2000 years
Your Islam has only been doing it for 800 years
so they have some catching upTo do
S
sodthisforfun
Not really.
And nope, I've not seen you prove I've said anything remotely racist.
All I get from you is childish, tantrum food-stomping 'your a racist' name-calling twittish behaviour because I've not agreed with everything you've said.
I will explain again:
People who use 'race' in the socially constructed sense, use it as a word that is synonymous with ethnicity. They have become accustomed to using that word in that sense.
People who use the word 'race' in the essentialist sense, do so within a racist ideology.
You persist in agreeing with EFLImpudence in insisting that there are more than one race within the human race, even though it is scientifically proven to be an incorrect ideology. Therefore you are ascribing to, propounding and promoting a fundamentally and inherently racist ideology.
Now, if you want, you could open this dialogue with those examples that you quoted, and ask them in which sense they used the word 'race'.
Until you do that, you have no idea what their concept of race is or was.
Racial essentialism
Some BS made up
By some fruit cake who would be hard pushed to find his back side in the dark with both hands and a torch
Racial essentialism jeez us wept I suppose some fruit cake has to buy into this BS
Himagin
Some BS made up
By some fruit cake
who would be hard pushed to find his back side in the dark with both hands and a torch Racial essentialism jeez us wept
I suppose some fruit cake has to buy into this BS Himagin
B
Bodd
Jason
Whats your veiw on David Lammy. Do you think he is a racist with his comments recently?
Whats your veiw on David Lammy. Do you think he is a racist with his comments recently?
Good God!
I will repeat again!
I have never suggested or implied that you have said anything racist.
I have said multiple times that because you propound, promote and ascribe to the essentialist concept of race you are fundamentally and inherently racist. You don't need to do anything else explicitly racist, just your promoting of that ideology is sufficient to demonstrate your racism.
I can kneel and pray, put money in the tray on Sundays, carry the bible, drink a sip of wine, take a bite of bread, etc, I don't need to say that I am a Christian. It would be reasonably obvious by my habits and behaviour.
Another time Bodd, please.
S
sodthisforfun
Good God, I will repeat again!!!
I am not racist, in any shape or form, no habits, no behaviour, I haven't propound, promote and ascribe to nowt, and despite your admission of the same, you still call me a racist.
So, good God, I will say again:
All I get from you is childish, tantrum food-stomping 'your a racist' name-calling twittish behaviour because I've not agreed with everything you've said.
Blimey just been reflecting 
I don't know any Chinese so I must be chinesesphobic
Come to think of it. I don't know any French either must be frenchaphobic
Mongolians ? Nope mongelaphobic
Jeez us the list gos on
Mind u I know an Icelander
I don't know any Chinese so I must be chinesesphobic
Come to think of it. I don't know any French either
must be frenchaphobic Mongolians ? Nope
mongelaphobic Jeez us the list gos on
Mind u I know an Icelander
You promoted and ascribed to the same ideology that EFLImpudence did, that of the essentialist argument about race.
Now unless your support for that ideology is in this thread, and I don't know if it is, and I have no intention of looking for it, I can not prove that you promoted, supported and ascribed to that essentialist ideology. But I remember that you did in the now deleted threads. That is sufficient for me.
Until and unless you state that you do not ascribe to that essentialist ideology of races within the human race, I can only assume that you continue to ascribe to it.
That is your personal opinion. It is not fact
False premise.
It is actually pretty low to state somebody is 'fundamentally and inherently racist', simply based on opinion with no proof.
I think you need to apologise.
B
Bodd
Yes another time please Bodd he's busy some thing to do with racial essentialism
It's no big deal.. He's not swerving it. He ll answer another time
S
sodthisforfun
I promoted what? You're lying again.
What you have real trouble understanding is that to acknowledge the dictionary term for race doesn't make someone a racist.
It has been a term used for a 100 years and in this day and age, it is an much used term by many people from many backgrounds. (which is why we have people like Michael Jackson saying he is black American and proud of his race).
You shouldn't think that the a person who understands the common usage means that they are racist, that they promote racism, that they have any part of racism. You are making a very stupid judgement about people, people who have never mentioned a hierarchy among races or indeed promoted such a disgusting thing, never said anything even remotely racist to say in any terms do we think racism is acceptable in any shape or form - in fact the exact opposite. To call people racist just on their thoughts in a debate about the dictionary term and a term that is widely used again shows me that you are so far off actually understanding what being a racist actually entails. You're just getting off on calling people racists - it's what you've always done, it's what you always do, no matter what user name you are using this week.
Grow up and GSFP
Last edited by a moderator:
- Status
