Thanks to everyone for the responses.
Spark123: My mum reads the meter every time a bill comes in, so it was last read three months ago. It was accurate then.
rebuke: We're comparing the reading to both the last bill (as the same amount of electricity would have been used due to the same weather conditions, amount of daylight etc.) and the bill from this time last year.
We're saying six months worth because the meter says we've used over 1000 units in 3 months, where we'd usually use around 600; thus meaning it thinks we've used almost six months worth in three. We're not going by monetry cost, just units.
No immersions left on, although it's switched on for about 30 minutes in the morning and then manually turned off again.
No other electrical heating systems.
We can't physically turn everything off due to the plug socket for one of the fridge-freezers being behind the appliance and we can't move it! So the test would be wrong. But we had thought of doing it.
Will look into the power monitor. Is this a similar device to what Newboy1996 has suggested or are you refering to the retail devices that you plug in between the appliance and the wall socket?
wingcox: No, it's an electricity meter, but I know what you're talking about as a Gas engineer told me I was better off with the old meter when I was renting a few years ago!
Newboy1996: Will do!
The main problem we have is the fear that the electric company will insist that we pay for the 1000+ units when we know there's no way we could have used this much electricity. We went to Silverstone on Friday and stayed over that night with my aunt so as a mini test we read the meter before we left and when we got back. We read the meter on Thursday evening at 1134 and it was 16921.75 (I know you don't count the .75, I'm just adding it for accuracy). That was before we went to bed. I read for an hour (energy saving lighbulb in the lamp), left my laptop on (energy star rating) and the Sky box, and both fridge-freezers were on. Forgot to read it Friday morning (rush!) but I turned off the laptop around 7am, leaving only the 2 fridges and the light for my snake on (this is also an energy saving bulb, but a special one for UV.) and the Sky box. Nothing else was on and all items not being used were turned off at the wall. We came home at about 2100 on Saturday evening. Had the TV on for about 2 hours, read for an hour and then bed. Next reading Sunday morning at 1110 (so this equates to a 48 hour period, give or take 25 minutes) was 16941.97. So, according to this reading we used 20 units over 48 hours and had been out for most of that period. Again, the two fridges and the Sky box are always on. The UV light for my snake is on for 8 hours a day.
Now, since we don't have an account of usage within a 48 hour period from before this problem it's difficult to say if this is right or wrong, but it does seem a lot considering we weren't there for most of the time! If the meter says, then, that we're using 10 units a day (for the sake of argument), that means 300 units in an average month and 900 units a quarter. Now, for the period 18th October 2008 to 20th January 2009 we used 931 units. This is usual as it was winter. The next bill for the period 21st January to 21st April we'd used 672 units (actual reading), which is a bit higher than usual but I was refitting the bathroom and used a few power tools so we expected the bill to be higher. The last bill, for 22nd April to 17th July is estimated as using 587 units. That same period last year was 612 units, so that's about right. As I said, nothing in the house has changed other than my new PC (which actually uses less power than the old one) and the fact we're using the immersion for about 30 minutes a day.
This is why we think there's something wrong. There's a discrepancy of over 400 units in this last quater that we cannot account for.
We're going to contact the company for further investigtions. Do any of you have any advice as to how we should go about getting them to look at it before they land us with a massive bill we can't pay?
Cheers,
Ex.