I have an MOT done at 2 years of age.
Surely still under warranty; and as such 'must' be serviced in order to keep to the warranty conditions? Isn't that enough?
I have an MOT done at 2 years of age.
I have an MOT done at 2 years of age.
The last car we bought had a 5 year warranty, but it still needed an official MOT at 3.Surely still under warranty; and as such 'must' be serviced annually/on mileage, in order to keep to the warranty conditions? Isn't that enough?
Of course, but not my point. New cars have to be scrutinised in order to maintain the warranty. Is that not sufficient?The last car we bought had a 5 year warranty, but it still needed an official MOT at 3.
Was the same in South Africa but it was the responsibility of the new owner, not the seller.In most states if not all states of Australia, you only need to do an MOT once you sell the vehicle. Even if its 20 or 40 years old.
Of course, but not my point. New cars have to be scrutinised in order to maintain the warranty. Is that not sufficient?
The masses need to be kept in their lane. Governments don't want us to spend less (capitalist model and all that) and they can't tax us significantly less (where would the £££ come from) so instead we get bluster and waffle ... from ALL parties. Easy when in opposition to say 'things would be so much better under us' when in reality there are only so many ways to slice the socioeconomic cake.I am watching Boris on tv and I forget re local elections as Starmers said something like I have said, IE cutting around the edges won't help...but the oil companies are like cash machines and that Boris won't tax his mates or something like that.
Never mind tax the oil co's get them to behave and reduce diesel prices by at least 15p a litre if not more.
They are obliged to have it maintained in accordance with the manufacturers specifications to maintain the manufacturers warranty. Anyone can do it as long as it's done to that spec using service parts of equal or better quality. How they would prove the quality of parts in the vent of a warranty claim, I wouldn't know.No.
Nobody is obliged by law to have their car inspected by a dealer, and to have faults rectified.
obliged by law
there are only so many ways to slice the socioeconomic cake.
They are not even 'obliged' to have it inspected by a dealer. Nobody mentioned 'by law' except you. Might as well said 'by order of the peaky blinders'.No.
Nobody is obliged by law to have their car inspected by a dealer, and to have faults rectified.
It'll never happen, not across the patch anyway. In their defense I understand some (many?) do pay their fair share e.g. Denise Coates of BET365 however all that stuff aside, something has gone seriously wrong (or right depending on your view) re the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. I can't remember the numbers and can't be ar5ed looking them up, however I read something a few weeks back re directors pay vs worker pay. x decades ago they earned on average 8 times more than their staff, now it's 30 times more, or something like that. If anyone thinks that's fair then they have a different take on it than me.one of which is to let billionaires and multinationals off lightly.
another would be to require them to pay their fair share.
Of course, but not my point. New cars have to be scrutinised in order to maintain the warranty. Is that not sufficient?