Yes, just look at all the bankers that have ruined lives, driven people to suicide and even brought a country to its knees.
Suit wearers eh. Ought to round up the lot and put 'em in prison.
One rule for Blair.....
- Thread starter noseall
- Start date
Suit wearers eh. Ought to round up the lot and put 'em in prison.
Sponsored Links
Hence why in theory we have a government to safe guard from criminals like this, otherwise there's no actual point in government. The fact Blair bended over backwards for these vermin practically gave them a golden ticket to commit crime, but of course it's a two way street. Psychopaths all round.
Sponsored Links
D
Doggit
Uh no, Gordon Brown took a light touch with the financial markets, so they ran riot. There was insufficient regulation, and that helped create the banking crisis.
As governments are only interested in getting back in to power, and not in doing their job, I'm begining to think they are an expesnsive waste of time. We need business men, not politicians to run the country, so maybe it should be outosuced or privatised.
I still think Guy Fawkes had the right idea.
Excuse me Noseall, but I used to wear a suit; and I still do at weddings and funerals.
I expect he knew about the polonium tea fed to Litvinenko
So Gordon Brown is responsible and not Blair? You don't think as prime minster Blair shares any of that responsibility? Jesus christ man. You look and see how fast Putin cracks down on corruption it makes this lot look like wet sock puppets.
D
Doggit
Brown was responsible for helping create the conditions for the banking crisis, and Blair was responsible for taking Britain to war on a set of complete lies. Putin though does makes them look like novices, as it's reckoned that he has amassed a multi billion pound (Rouble) empire that he's salted away for his retirement. He only cracks down on those who are getting a bigger slice than he is.
I've corrected that for you.
Total *******s. I've told you before to stop watching that BBC shyte.
Don't believe a fraction of what you hear about him from a western media outlet.
D
Doggit
Why not; okay, maybe because of a degree of bias, but you seem a supporter of Putin, would that be right.
Much more to the point, don't believe anything you read on Russia or Russian interests on social media.
Paid trolls and automated bots spread misinformation and rumour to cause confusion and erode trust in more reliable sources that you can investigate and question.
For example, after MH17 was shot down by a missile operated by Russian forces in the invaded part of Ukraine, rumours were spread that it had been shot down by Ukrainian fighters. Witness statements were forged claiming that people could see, and identify, planes at a height of 6500metres (4 miles), with the naked eye, or that they had heard gunfire. Even after the wreckage had been edited in the separatist-held territory, "experts" were assembled to claim that the wreckage showed signs of gunfire, and that a Russian missile couldn't possibly have caused the damage. It was even claimed that Russian radar had tracked fighters attacking the plane. Alternatively it was claimed that Ukrainian forces had bought the latest model of Russian missile and used it to shoot down a plane over rebel territory.
Pro-Russian propagandists trustingly recirculated this propaganda and argued with more reliable Western sources.
In the same way, Russian supporters denied that Russian forces had invaded Crimea, and even claimed that the soldiers and vehicles with insignia removed were simply concerned local citizens who had equipped themselves from a hiking and surplus store.
The official Russian media are government-controlled and are simply Kremlin mouthpieces.
Paid trolls and automated bots spread misinformation and rumour to cause confusion and erode trust in more reliable sources that you can investigate and question.
For example, after MH17 was shot down by a missile operated by Russian forces in the invaded part of Ukraine, rumours were spread that it had been shot down by Ukrainian fighters. Witness statements were forged claiming that people could see, and identify, planes at a height of 6500metres (4 miles), with the naked eye, or that they had heard gunfire. Even after the wreckage had been edited in the separatist-held territory, "experts" were assembled to claim that the wreckage showed signs of gunfire, and that a Russian missile couldn't possibly have caused the damage. It was even claimed that Russian radar had tracked fighters attacking the plane. Alternatively it was claimed that Ukrainian forces had bought the latest model of Russian missile and used it to shoot down a plane over rebel territory.
Pro-Russian propagandists trustingly recirculated this propaganda and argued with more reliable Western sources.
In the same way, Russian supporters denied that Russian forces had invaded Crimea, and even claimed that the soldiers and vehicles with insignia removed were simply concerned local citizens who had equipped themselves from a hiking and surplus store.
The official Russian media are government-controlled and are simply Kremlin mouthpieces.
A strong leader that cares about his people, what's not to like?
Exact same practice carried out by the intelligence services in this country and the US - ''automated bots spread misinformation and
rumour to cause confusion and erode trust in more reliable sources that you can investigate and question.''
MH17 - no proof at all it was shot down by Russian military.
Russia did not invade Ukraine, it was attacked by the US by proxy using paid seperatists and was amply defended by Putin. Warranted as 60% of the population are Russian - he is protecting his people from attack. They did the same to Hitler. Attacked him all the while he was trying to make peace. Mostly because he hated debt poverty and wanted the demonic system of usury abolished. All the people that have gone against the corrupt banking cartels and wanted debt free currency have been assasinated - JFK, Abraham Lincoln, for example. Putin banished the Rothchild's from Russia, and from owning a bank in Russian, good on him.
The US is an imperialist, expansionist empire. This is how they siege; prime examples : Iran, Iraq, South American, North & South Africa, where this fails they send in the military (Saddam Hussain/Gaddafi) to steal oil and mineral reserves. Hundreds of thousands of people killed in the process. The UK is allied to them.
Ukraine is also a strategic strong point the US want to capture so it can build military bases and nuclear weapons facilities right next to Russia and then say Russia is the aggressor for defending itself. It failed.
The US has absolutely no problem commiting atrocities against it's own people, for example 9/11. Twin towers were demolished using super thermite explosive charges. They blamed it on Arabs piloting 2 jet planes. A total lie. It's impossible to have two steel and concrete framed buildings collapse in freefall as is seen in the footage of that day, only explosive (demolition) charge can do this. A pre-meditated attack (sacrifice) carried out by a black OP group of the US government. They used this as a precursor for military invasion in Iraq and all the subsequent arms and infrastructure contracts since and subsequent invasions.
Yes I like Russia. A proud nationalist country that hasn't been sold down the ****ing road for the 1% to profit from. They have no national debt, unlike this country which is swimming in it. Hence why you are sucked dry of everything you have, even in death to keep the animal on it's legs.
Sponsored Links
