• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Raynor the tax dodger

thats a typical Sun lie

she has a London property which she is given to use for her job

and she doesnt own her 1st home

so how many homes does she have?
You better let her know before she shells out tens of thousands £££££. You could then tell her how to invest it in premium bonds
 
thats a typical Sun lie

she has a London property which she is given to use for her job

and she doesnt own her 1st home

so how many homes does she have?
Im not up on all this property lark....

So if I put my house in a trust for my son and buy another house I dont need to pay stamp duty?
 
Im not up on all this property lark....

So if I put my house in a trust for my son and buy another house I dont need to pay stamp duty?

I think there's a higher rate when you buy a second home.
 
Can someone simplify what she's done wrong for me?

By putting the house in trust would that alter the stamp duty payable on the flat she bought?

Confused
 
Can someone simplify what she's done wrong for me?

By putting the house in trust would that alter the stamp duty payable on the flat she bought?

Confused

If you already own one home, you have to pay a 3% higher rate of stamp duty when you buy a second home.

AR was advised that if she put her current house in trust, she would no longer be the legal owner of that house. That meant that when she bought the flat in Hove, that flat would be the only property she owned. Which means she would have paid the normal rate of stamp duty on that flat, rather than the one which is 3% more.
 
If you already own one home, you have to pay a 3% higher rate of stamp duty when you buy a second home.

AR was advised that if she put her current house in trust, she would no longer be the legal owner of that house. That meant that when she bought the flat in Hove, that flat would be the only property she owned. Which means she would have paid the normal rate of stamp duty, rather than the ones which is 3% more.
Thanks....so she probably done the trust so she didn't have to pay that extra 3%? Maybe?
 
Can someone simplify what she's done wrong for me?

By putting the house in trust would that alter the stamp duty payable on the flat she bought?

Confused

From what I understand the trust means Rayner and her ex husband are effectively the “owners” until said child is 18 and hence why it’s still considered partly hers.

And hence SDLT is payable @ 5%
 
Back
Top