No, it's a deliberate act of estate agents to inflate house prices.So you think it’s an honest mistake ?
In the case of AR, she deliberately took extra money out of her son's trust to buy another property.
It's not a mistake.

No, it's a deliberate act of estate agents to inflate house prices.So you think it’s an honest mistake ?

here is car its worth 10,000. I will "give" 75% of it to you for £7,500.2 questions?
How can one house be worth twice as much as any other in the street?
And it's robbing in a good way because he will be left it all anyway one day wont he? Probably?

But when you act in someone's best interest, because they do not have the capacity, you are supposed to act in their best interests, not your own.Its not about honesty or dishonesty. Its about flexible estate agents. A house near us was marketed for 450k and sold for under 300. A lot depends on the purchaser
The son might need independent advice given the over valuationBut when you act in someone's best interest, because they do not have the capacity, you are supposed to act in their best interests, not your own.
There could have been a scenario where the Son lent his mum the extra, interest free.

its been a while since I did a TR1. but I vaguely recall you have to state the value for partial transfers. If it is fully transferred, there is stamp duty to pay (what more cries Angela Rayner?) save for inheritance and divorce. But since her ex-owns a share that is deferred.If this is the masterclass in tax avoidance that some are calling it, maybe it’s a step towards forcing a petition based by election. House revaluations are not public record afaik, so it seems somebody has inside information or has breached data protection /privacy rights to get the story. But it’s not unusual to get a wide range of valuations when selling a house. And street values vary significantly by property type do averages can be misleading. It’s really cruel to suggest she is harming her child for money, he is staying there for his care under a court order.
100%. Plus I have never heard of a qualified survey overvaluing a house. Its usual for Estate agents to, but not surveyors.The son might need independent advice given the over valuation
Yes it was a transfer of her interest so probably on the land register house price app.its been a while since I did a TR1. but I vaguely recall you have to state the value for partial transfers. If it is fully transferred, there is stamp duty to pay (what more cries Angela Rayner?) save for inheritance and divorce. But since her ex-owns a share that is deferred.
Surveyors should be a little more careful but I have come across one surveyor value a house for 50% more than another valued it for probate100%. Plus I have never heard of a qualified survey overvaluing a house. Its usual for Estate agents to, but not surveyors.

Well he obviously didn’t get the memo.Surveyors should be a little more careful but I have come across one surveyor value a house for 50% more than another valued it for probate
To be fair the surveyor was employed by the estate agentsWell he obviously didn’t get the memo.![]()

Being cleared? Raynor paid the difference also. That's not the point - he tried to dodge the tax, and it wsn't due to poor advice either!Memory loss eh? Not convinced but he was cleared
He benefited from the 6+ rule and actually saved a lot more than a 100k but quite legitimately. The rule was later changed.Being cleared? Raynor paid the difference also. That's not the point - he tried to dodge the tax, and it wsn't due to poor advice either!

she didn't get poor advice, that is why she had to go.Being cleared? Raynor paid the difference also. That's not the point - he tried to dodge the tax, and it wsn't due to poor advice either!
Ive got a similar tree in my garden I never know what to do with them, what do you do? Jam? Pie?
The bible is a genocidal, bigoted, slave promoting book, so I suppose it isn't your fault.