I
imamartian
Yes - you're missing this:Gents, am i missing something here?
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=referenda
softus, that looks incredibly similar to the link i posted !
Yes - you're missing this:Gents, am i missing something here?
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=referenda
if i were cameron i would offer a referendum about hanging, i think that he would get in tomorrow if he were willing to act on the results..
if i were cameron i would offer a referendum about hanging, i think that he would get in tomorrow if he were willing to act on the results..
It's not going to happen mate. (I'm glad to say)
These risks are not comparable.AtoZ said:ultimately, i would have hanging. we are in more danger not having a smoke alarm than getting hanged by mistake.
I disagree - it's incredibly simple.i am happy to defend this position but this is complicated and far reaching.
OK. But when you find out, just remember that you didn't hear it from me.dont tell me that i will have a union jack BNP tattoo and that i dont like gays or that i am worried about my sexuality.
You've misunderstood. The choice is that of the risk-taker. If I voted against hanging, but was subsequently hanged for something that you did (killing a black gay jew, for example), then I would not have had any choice in the matter.please dont tell me that the risks of a smoke alarm are not comparable because we would have to choose to have hanging restored. that implies some choice in the matter.
I didn't - I merely pointed out that there are people to whom it's unacceptable.you have a view softus (overly trendy imho) but you cannot tell me what is acceptable.
You find it odd because you've made wrong assumptions about my reasoning and motives. That's not what I would call listening.i do find it odd that anyone who has the anti BNP/gay/sexuality worries/anti hanging/ liberty for all type arguements turn into adolf hitler when someone challenges their bbc/unrealistic/chattering view of the world.
No. I would do more than that. I would campaign against it. I would lobby my MP. I would fight tooth and nail to prevent it happening, and, if outvoted, I would continue to campaign to abolish it, and would peacefully protest at every attempt to implement a death sentence.i would vote for, you would vote against.
Respec' innit.quite clearly i have got some of my assumptions wrong and i aplogise for that.
That's why I would behave lawfully, but I don't have to accept the law as it stands - membership of the democracy furnishes me with the right to seek to change the law.if you take part in a democracy then you have to abide by the decisions that are made by the majority.
I don't see the parallel. Your union membership was a contract. You would have been in breach of the contract if you didn't swim with the shoal.i once had to go out on a strike which i was adamant i didnt want, but when some one said to me " you have tried all you can to fight against the strike but have lost the vote, how can you now go against the majority. what is the point in joining the union. (this person disagreed too)
I choose to vote, and I choose to communicate with my MP.you participate, you choose.
Fair play - you're no namsag.for what is worth softus, i would not be to far from your view.
there are loads of conditions i would need to see before i would agree to hanging but none of them based on the risk of hanging the wrong man by mistake as such.
for me i would be more concerned about the sun newspaper deciding to hang whoever it deems as guilty.