
One of my pet hates is reticent when it should be reluctant.Why is this modern incorrect use of this term (" I refute that") when they have not refutted it at all?
To refute is to prove that an accusation is wrong and not purely to deny it!
One of my pet hates is reticent when it should be reluctant.
That's right. Reticent means holding back (in speech or writing).Very interesting. Reticent is not a word I use very much. I suppose an example might be:
"He was reticent about his private life"
or
"He was reluctant to discuss his private life"
I think those two sentences mean roughly the same thing.
But you shouldn't write:
"He was reticent to discuss his private life"

Very interesting. Reticent is not a word I use very much. I suppose an example might be:
"He was reticent about his private life"
or
"He was reluctant to discuss his private life"
I think those two sentences mean roughly the same thing.
But you shouldn't write:
"He was reticent to discuss his private life"

"would of..." for "would have...."
NoYou've seen The Grammar Police Mug?
No it couldn't. You can only be reluctant to do something, not reluctant about something.But if he didn't like his private life, and thought it was wrong, it could be OK to write "He was reluctant about his private life"![]()
"You know...." runs it a close secondLike, like, like, every other ****ing word is like.