Revolting Iranians

No that is according to Medicins Sans Frontieres (Doctors Without Borders), United Nations and the ICC (International Criminal Court who found Hamas Guilty of War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity), you have been brainwashed by the Far Left and Extremist Terror Organisations Propaganda that always plays the "Victim" card and you still cannot accept the Truth when it is Proven.
For sure there is plenty of accusations directed at MSF, and Hamas, in the Israeli propaganda machine, but no genuine MSF accusation of Hamas using Human Shields that I can find. So please present your evidence of MSF accusing Hamas of what you say.
Similarly MSF have criticised the actions of Hamas, but they have not accused them of war crimes. Whereas MSF have strongly condemned Israeli actions in Gaza, describing them as indiscriminate, and has documented the destruction of healthcare infrastructure, the killing of staff, and the dire, forced conditions imposed on civilians, which align with descriptions of war crimes.
Let's look at the UN:
While UN officials have raised concerns about Palestinian armed groups operating in densely populated areas, these actions are frequently described in UN reports as "allegations," "claims," or "unverified reports" rather than definitive, deeply analyzed conclusions, with some reports noting that in certain instances, evidence for these allegations was not provided.
While UN officials have accused Hamas of utilizing civilians as shields, human rights groups and international law experts (including some within the UN framework) have emphasized that even if such tactics are used, it does not relieve Israel of its obligation to adhere to principles of distinction, proportionality, and precaution in its military actions.
The issue is heavily disputed, with some UN reports noting that Israel has not always provided sufficient evidence for its human shields allegations, and other reports noting that Israel itself has been accused of using Palestinians as human shields

So, in summary, any accusations by the UN of Hamas using human shields is usually based on Israeli reports, which are disputed.
Also, if it is true that Hamas have used civilians as human shields, the IDF still has a duty to avoid civilian casualties.
In addition Israel has also used Palestinian civilians as human shields.

But it is true that the UN has accused both Hamas and Israel of war crimes. As Israel was the attacker and was far superior in technology and weapons, one would expect Israel to be able to, and to have actually conducted itself within international legal frameworks. But the very opposite is true.

But none of this is transferable to the Iranians, as you try to do, simply because they are also Muslims.

Now let's look at the ICC:
The ICC have levelled war crimes against Hamas, but the use of civilians as Human Shields is not one of those crimes listed.
However there is growing evidence of Israel using civilians as Human Shields during its committing of genocide in Gaza:
A recent report by The Associated Press that exposed the Israeli military’s “systematic” use of Palestinians as human shields has shone a light on an illegal practice that has become commonplace over the 19-month war in Gaza and parallel offensives in the West Bank.

The ICC have issued warrants for the arrest of both some Hamas operatives (who are most probably now dead), and some Israeli leaders, namely Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, the former Israeli minister for defense.


In summary,
your claim that MSF, the UN and the ICC have accused Hamas of using civilians as human shields is completely bogus and without evidence.
But there is credible evidence that Israel has used Palestinians civilians as human shields.
Also, the MSF has not accused neither Hamas, but they have strongly condemned Israel of indiscriminate killing , which is
aligned with descriptions of war crimes.


So your rant is a typical hate-induced rant against Muslims, based on Israeli and USA propaganda and lies.
 
Last edited:
The "Modern Day" Jewish Bible the Tanakh which contains the Torah (The 5 Books of Moses which is the first section of the 3 sections that make up the Tanakh) is accepted as written about the 2nd Century BCE (Before the Common Era) or BC (Before Christ) as evidenced by the Dead Sea Scrolls, whilst the Christian Bible is split into 2 Testaments, with the Old Testament believed to have been written in about 1200 BC (Before Christ) and the New Testament written between 50 and 100 AC (After Christ).
So the Jewish and its sequel, The Bible are even older fairy stories which would make them even less relevant to modern day society.

There are numerous Jewish Denominations of which some believe the Tanakh is an Ideology and Way of Life while others accept that parts are outdated and should be ignored, which also appears to be the way with the Holy Bible.
So there are various factions within Jewish, Christian and Muslim faiths. So they're all much of a muchness. and there's no real need or relevance to modern society for any of them. Yet the mutual hatred and hostility between them remains and appears to be irreconcilable.
And the violence and killing continues. And you're defending and propagating it.
Don't you think that Israel, and the US, as the most technologically advanced and equipped participants, have the moral duty to reduce hostilities, and stop the killing.
But no, they continue the violence and killing because they can and want to. They're indoctrinated to do it. It's literally "in their DNA".
And their people want them to continue, because it's in their DNA also.


Most Jews and Christians including the Rabbis, Priesthoods and Ministries are philosophical enough to accept that certain actions and beliefs from thousands of years ago are not acceptable in this day and age.
However, many of the Imams, Muftis and Islamic Scholars believe that the Quran and Hadiths should be followed to the word and that is the way that they preach and expect their congregations to follow.
Are, bless, you use a religious indoctrination to argue that Jewish and Christian faiths are superior to the Islam faith.
How blinkered are you to argue that in having three faiths based on fairy stories, that two are superior to the other one?
The sheer fact of having three diffierring fairy stories (actually, there's many more), means that all of them are fairy stories, and none of them are factually correct, nor the one and only 'right' one.

Your argument is again totally illogical.
 
Back
Top